Literature DB >> 11952919

Pain threshold and pain recovery after experimental stimulation in patients with burning mouth syndrome.

Mikiko Ito1, Kenichi Kurita, Takako Ito, Munetaka Arao.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine pain threshold and pain recovery in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) and matched no-pain controls. Twenty female patients diagnosed with BMS without organic gross changes were enrolled in the study. Twenty control subjects were chosen from age-matched healthy female volunteers. We compared the thermal pain threshold using heat beam dolorimeter on the finger and tongue between patients and controls. Warm (at 50 degrees C for 5 s), cold (at 0 degrees C for 30 s) and mechanical (stimulation by electric tooth brush for 15 s) stimulation was applied to the tongue for both groups. Participants were asked to rate the subjective pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Although there was no significant differences between patients and controls in terms of the threshold on the finger, the threshold on the tongue was significantly higher in patients than in controls. We suggest there were peripheral dysfunction at the tongue, and/or central dysfunction in patients with BMS. Among the three types of stimulation, the patients perceived significantly the highest pain from the mechanical stimulation for the first 5 min after the stimulation. Furthermore, when patients with BMS perceived some pain, they continued to complain of the pain longer and more intricately than the controls. This indicates that the pain of the patients is strongly affected not only at a sensory component but also at an affective/motivational component than the controls. However, we should be cautious of simply advancing psychogenic theory in this etiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11952919     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2002.00950.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 1323-1316            Impact factor:   5.188


  8 in total

Review 1.  Burning mouth syndrome.

Authors:  José G Speciali; Juliana Stuginski-Barbosa
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2008-08

Review 2.  Burning mouth syndrome.

Authors:  Grigoriy E Gurvits; Amy Tan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Thermal quantitative sensory testing in burning mouth syndrome.

Authors:  Anne Wolowski; N Schwarzbach; H Hörning
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Oral sensory nerve damage: Causes and consequences.

Authors:  Derek J Snyder; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Therapeutic options in idiopathic burning mouth syndrome: literature review.

Authors:  Ivan Miziara; Azis Chagury; Camila Vargas; Ludmila Freitas; Ali Mahmoud
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-09

Review 6.  Burning mouth syndrome: Current concepts.

Authors:  Cibele Nasri-Heir; Julyana Gomes Zagury; Davis Thomas; Sowmya Ananthan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

7.  Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls.

Authors:  Donald R Nixdorf; Azar Hemmaty; John O Look; Eric L Schiffman; Mike T John
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Co-occurrence of Pain Symptoms and Somatosensory Sensitivity in Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xavier Moisset; Valentina Calbacho; Pilar Torres; Christelle Gremeau-Richard; Radhouane Dallel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.