Literature DB >> 11950095

Relationship between mTHPC fluorescence photobleaching and cell viability during in vitro photodynamic treatment of DP16 cells.

Jonathan S Dysart1, Michael S Patterson, Thomas J Farrell, Gurmit Singh.   

Abstract

An implicit dosimetric model has been proposed in which biological damage caused by photodynamic therapy (PDT) is monitored through the decrease in sensitizer fluorescence during treatment. To investigate this, in vitro experiments were performed in which DP16 cells were incubated in meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) and then irradiated with 514 nm light. Photosensitizer concentration, fluence rate and oxygenation were independently controlled and monitored during the treatment. Fluorescence of mTHPC was continuously monitored via a charge-coupled device-coupled spectrometer during treatment and, at selected fluence levels, cell viability was determined using a trypan blue exclusion assay. The relationship of cell viability to normalized fluorescence was obtained for the different treatment conditions. The relationship was independent of cell medium oxygenation, treatment fluence rate and sensitizer incubation concentration except at a high mTHPC concentration (4 microg/mL). This relationship suggests that fluorescence bleaching may be used to predict mTHPC PDT damage in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11950095     DOI: 10.1562/0031-8655(2002)075<0289:rbmfpa>2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  5 in total

1.  Insights into photodynamic therapy dosimetry: simultaneous singlet oxygen luminescence and photosensitizer photobleaching measurements.

Authors:  Mark T Jarvi; Michael S Patterson; Brian C Wilson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  PDT dose parameters impact tumoricidal durability and cell death pathways in a 3D ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Imran Rizvi; Sriram Anbil; Nermina Alagic; Jonathan Celli; Jonathan P Celli; Lei Zak Zheng; Akilan Palanisami; Michael D Glidden; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Photodynamic dose does not correlate with long-term tumor response to mTHPC-PDT performed at several drug-light intervals.

Authors:  Ken Kang-Hsin Wang; Soumya Mitra; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Singlet oxygen luminescence as an in vivo photodynamic therapy dose metric: validation in normal mouse skin with topical amino-levulinic acid.

Authors:  M J Niedre; C S Yu; M S Patterson; B C Wilson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Monitoring photosensitizer uptake using two photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.

Authors:  Shu-Chi Allison Yeh; Kevin R Diamond; Michael S Patterson; Zhaojun Nie; Joseph E Hayward; Qiyin Fang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 11.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.