Literature DB >> 11944985

Methylation dynamics of imprinted genes in mouse germ cells.

Diana Lucifero1, Carmen Mertineit, Hugh J Clarke, Timothy H Bestor, Jacquetta M Trasler.   

Abstract

DNA methylation differences between maternal and paternal alleles of many imprinted genes are inherited from the male and female gametes and subsequently maintained during development. However, the stages of gametogenesis during which methylation imprints are established have not been well defined. In this study, we used bisulfite sequencing to determine the methylation dynamics of the imprinted genes small nuclear ribonucleoprotein N (Snrpn), insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (Igf2r), mesoderm-specific transcript (Mest; formerly Peg1), paternally expressed gene 3 (Peg3), and H19 fetal liver mRNA (H19). We identified regions in the maternally imprinted genes (Snrpn, Mest, and Peg3) that were unmethylated in sperm but 100% methylated in mature oocytes. Igf2r, which is expressed from the maternal allele, was completely methylated within intronic differentially methylated region 2 in oocytes and unmethylated in sperm. The 5' region of H19, a paternally imprinted gene, was completely methylated in sperm and unmethylated in oocytes. We examined the methylation status of Snrpn during oocyte growth and maturation. Whereas the DNA of non-growing oocytes was mostly unmethylated, mid-size growing oocytes had a mosaic pattern of allelic methylation, and full acquisition of the methylation imprint was complete by metaphase II. We have identified regions within imprinted genes that show gamete-specific methylation patterns in mature germ cells and demonstrated that maternal methylation imprints on at least one imprinted gene, Snrpn, are established during the postnatal growth phase of oogenesis. Thus, whereas paternal imprints seem to be established early (in diploid gonocytes well before the onset of meiosis), maternal imprints are established late (in growing oocytes that are arrested in the diplotene stage of meiosis). These findings raise the possibility that assisted reproductive technologies that involve in vitro maturation of oocytes may result in developmental abnormalities due to incomplete methylation imprints in immature oocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11944985     DOI: 10.1006/geno.2002.6732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  113 in total

1.  Limiting dilution bisulfite (pyro)sequencing reveals parent-specific methylation patterns in single early mouse embryos and bovine oocytes.

Authors:  Nady El Hajj; Tom Trapphoff; Matthias Linke; Andreas May; Tamara Hansmann; Juliane Kuhtz; Kurt Reifenberg; Julia Heinzmann; Heiner Niemann; Angelika Daser; Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter; Ulrich Zechner; Thomas Haaf
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.528

2.  Functional characterization of a testis-specific DNA binding activity at the H19/Igf2 imprinting control region.

Authors:  Aaron B Bowman; John M Levorse; Robert S Ingram; Shirley M Tilghman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Reprogramming of primordial germ cells begins before migration into the genital ridge, making these cells inadequate donors for reproductive cloning.

Authors:  Yukiko Yamazaki; Mellissa R W Mann; Susan S Lee; Joel Marh; John R McCarrey; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; Marisa S Bartolomei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lack of homologous sequence-specific DNA methylation in response to stable dsRNA expression in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Petr Svoboda; Paula Stein; Witold Filipowicz; Richard M Schultz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Gamete imprinting: implications for assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Jacquetta M Trasler
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Primary epimutations introduced during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are corrected by germline-specific epigenetic reprogramming.

Authors:  Eric de Waal; Yukiko Yamazaki; Puraskar Ingale; Marisa Bartolomei; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genomic imprinting and epigenetic control of development.

Authors:  Andrew Fedoriw; Joshua Mugford; Terry Magnuson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  Genomic imprinting of XX spermatogonia and XX oocytes recovered from XX<-->XY chimeric testes.

Authors:  Ayako Isotani; Tomoko Nakanishi; Shin Kobayashi; Jiyoung Lee; Shinichiro Chuma; Norio Nakatsuji; Fumitoshi Ishino; Masaru Okabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effects of ooplasm manipulation on DNA methylation and growth of progeny in mice.

Authors:  Yong Cheng; Kai Wang; Lori D Kellam; Young S Lee; Cheng-Guang Liang; Zhiming Han; Namdori R Mtango; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  Imprinting errors and developmental asymmetry.

Authors:  Timothy H Bestor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.