Literature DB >> 11941995

The autopsy: a professional responsibility in assuring quality of care.

Elizabeth C Burton1.   

Abstract

Forty years ago, the value of autopsies was widely recognized as new diseases were discovered or clarified and scientific technology advanced greatly. Despite the autopsy's strong foundation, its value is not currently being properly conveyed to physicians or patients. Although autopsy-related policy exists, these policies have had little effect on increasing or even maintaining adequate autopsy rates. More recently, the autopsy has fallen on hard times, with US hospital rates now below 5%. The reasons for the decline in rates are multifaceted and include a lack of direct reimbursement for the procedure, lack of defined minimum rate standards, overconfidence in diagnostic technology, and the fear of litigation. Regardless of the reasons for the declining rates, the ethical and professional reasons for increasing the number of autopsies are far more important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11941995     DOI: 10.1177/106286060201700203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  7 in total

1.  The medical autopsy: past, present, and dubious future.

Authors:  Louis P Dehner
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

2.  Reversing the slow death of the clinical necropsy: developing the post of the Pathology Liaison Nurse.

Authors:  Eileen Limacher; Urszula Carr; Lesley Bowker; Richard Y Ball
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  The potential use of autopsy for continuous quality improvement in hospice and palliative care.

Authors:  Franziska S Rokoske; Anna P Schenck; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-12-23

Review 4.  The value of postmortem microbiology cultures.

Authors:  Stefan Riedel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Barriers to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease autopsies, California.

Authors:  Janice K Louie; Shilpa S Gavali; Ermias D Belay; Rosalie Trevejo; Lucinda H Hammond; Lawrence B Schonberger; Duc J Vugia
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 6.  Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Britt M Blokker; Ivo M Wagensveld; Annick C Weustink; J Wolter Oosterhuis; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Autopsy Standardized Mortality Review: A Pilot Study Offering a Methodology for Improved Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  C A Early; M G F Gilliland; K L Kelly; W R Oliver; P J Kragel
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2019-02-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.