Literature DB >> 1194163

Quantitation of pharyngeal motor function in normal human subjects.

W J Dodds, W J Hogan, S B Lydon, E T Stewart, J J Stef, R C Arndorfer.   

Abstract

A need exists for accurate pressure recording of pharyngeal motor events. Results of this study indicate that accurate quantitation of pharyngeal motor activity is not possible using a water-filled catheter system, even when high infusion rates are used. An intraluminal strain gauge system, however, achieves high-fidelity recording. Quantitation of pharyngeal peristalsis using the intraluminal strain gauge system reveals peristaltic pressure amplitudes higher than those hitherto recorded. In normal subjects, peristaltic amplitude averages about 200 mmHg in the hypopharynx, complexes in one subject being as high as 600 mmHg. A zone of relatively low pressure exists in the oropharynx. Mean pharyngeal wave duration decreases progressively in an aboral direction, from 1.0 to 0.3 s, and peristaltic wave speeds range between 9 and 25 cm/s. Accurate quantitation of pharyngeal peristaltic variables provides the necessary basis for characterization and assessment of pharyngeal motor disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1194163     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1975.39.4.692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 0021-8987            Impact factor:   3.531


  26 in total

1.  Pharyngoesophageal manometry with an original balloon sensor probe for the study of oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Sandro Mattioli; Marialuisa Lugaresi; Romano Zannoli; Stefano Brusori; Franco d'Ovidio; Laura Braccaioli
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Propagation Curve and Velocity of Swallowing Pressure in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Keigo Matsubara; Yoshihiko Kumai; Yasuhiro Samejima; Eiji Yumoto
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Timing of videofluoroscopic, manometric events, and bolus transit during the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing.

Authors:  I J Cook; W J Dodds; R O Dantas; M K Kern; B T Massey; R Shaker; W J Hogan
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Graphic representation of pharyngeal wall motion during swallow: technical note.

Authors:  O Ekberg; P S Borgstrom
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Anatomophysiology of the pharyngo-upper esophageal area in light of high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Luciana C Silva; Fernando A M Herbella; Luciano R Neves; Fernando P P Vicentine; Sebastião P Neto; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A kinematic study of the oropharyngeal swallowing of a liquid.

Authors:  D N Ku; P P Ma; F M McConnel; D Cerenko
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Pharyngeal peristaltic pressure variability, operational range, and functional reserve.

Authors:  Mark K Kern; Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian; Patrick Sanvanson; Dilpesh Agrawal; Ashley Wuerl; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 8.  Physiological substrates of normal deglutition.

Authors:  J G Kennedy; R D Kent
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Evaluation of pharyngeal dysphagia with manofluorography.

Authors:  F M McConnel; D Cerenko; T Hersh; L J Weil
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  The effects of aspiration status, liquid type, and bolus volume on pharyngeal peak pressure in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Susan G Butler; Andrew Stuart; Erika Wilhelm; Catherine Rees; Jeff Williamson; Stephen Kritchevsky
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.