Literature DB >> 11941345

Comparison of fluoride release protocols for in-vitro testing of 3 orthodontic adhesives.

Arthur W Wheeler1, Timothy F Foley, Antonios Mamandras.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the fluoride release of 3 orthodontic adhesives using disks and bracketed teeth with different storage protocols. The adhesives used were a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) (Fuji Ortho LC; GC America, Aslip, Ill), a polyacid-modified composite resin (PMCR)(Assure; Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, Ill), and a composite control, Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). Metal brackets were bonded to the buccal and lingual surfaces of 120 extracted human premolars. Five plastic containers holding 4 teeth (8 brackets) were used for each adhesive protocol. The samples were stored in containers holding 4 mL of deionized water at 37 degrees C for 28 and 84 days for the brackets and disks, respectively. The bracketed samples released larger initial amounts of fluoride compared with the disk samples during the first 5 to 6 days for both fluoride-releasing adhesives. The PMCR (Assure) released more fluoride (mg/cm(2)/day) than did the RMGI (Fuji Ortho LC) in all protocols with the exception of daily protocols when values diminished below the RMGI values near the 24th day and between the 56th and the 70th days for the bracketed and disk samples, respectively. Inconsistent values for fluoride release were noted in the bracket and disk samples when compared with daily versus cumulative water changes. Daily water changes revealed higher fluoride release levels (brackets), but this trend was not evident in the disk samples. Daily water changes may yield more clinically relevant data on fluoride release.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11941345     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.120160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy of four preventive measures against enamel demineralization at the bracket periphery-comparison of microhardness and confocal laser microscopy analysis.

Authors:  Ekaterini Paschos; Franz-Josef Geiger; Yuriy Malyk; Ingrid Rudzki; Andrea Wichelhaus; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Do bonding agents protect the bracket-periphery?--Evaluation by consecutive μCT scans and fluorescence measurements.

Authors:  Ekaterini Paschos; Teresa Galosi; Karin C Huth; Ingrid Rudzki; Andrea Wichelhaus; Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of 10% papain gel on enamel deproteinization before bonding procedure.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Caio de Souza Ferraz; Gabriel do Couto de Oliveira; Tatiana Bahia Junqueira Pereira; Dauro Douglas Oliveira; Ricardo Alves de Souza; Lívia Maria Andrade de Freitas; Rogério Lacerda dos Santos
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Efficacy of light-activated sealant on enamel demineralization in orthodontic patients: an atomic force microscope evaluation.

Authors:  Suzi F Shinaishin; Safaa A Ghobashy; Tarek H El-Bialy
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-11-23

5.  Fluoride release and uptake abilities of different fissure sealants.

Authors:  Claudio Poggio; Gianluigi Andenna; Matteo Ceci; Riccardo Beltrami; Marco Colombo; Lucia Cucca
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-07-01

6.  Influence of resin-modified glass ionomer and topical fluoride on levels of Streptococcus mutans in saliva and biofilm adjacent to metallic brackets.

Authors:  Marcela Cristina Damião Andrucioli; Gisele Faria; Paulo Nelson-Filho; Fábio Lourenço Romano; Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.