Literature DB >> 11940751

Percutaneous tracheostomy: prospective comparison of the translaryngeal technique versus the forceps-dilational technique in 100 critically ill adults.

Emmanuel Cantais1, Eric Kaiser, Yann Le-Goff, Bruno Palmier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two different techniques of percutaneous tracheostomy: Griggs' forceps-dilational technique and Fantoni's translaryngeal technique, both performed with the manufacturer's basic kit and with bronchoscopic guidance.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial was designed to compare the two tracheostomy techniques. Critically ill patients requiring elective tracheostomy for long-term ventilation were randomized for translaryngeal tracheostomy or forceps-dilational tracheostomy.
SETTING: Intensive care unit of a military teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 100 adult patients in the intensive care unit who were mechanically ventilated. PROCEDURES: All tracheostomy procedures were performed at the bedside by using a commercially available set. The procedures were performed by two surgeons, one for bronchoscopic guidance and management of the airway and one for the tracheostomy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The measurements were divided into procedure-related variables (duration, technical difficulties, oxygenation): major and minor complications. The procedure was longer in the translaryngeal technique group (12.9 vs. 6.9 mins, p =.0018). Technical difficulties occurred in 11 patients in the translaryngeal technique group. Uneventful forceps dilational tracheostomy was performed instead. There has been no mortality associated with either technique. Serious complications occurred in one patient in the forceps-dilational technique group (one posterior tracheal wall injury) and in four patients in the translaryngeal technique group (one with a posterior tracheal wall injury and three with severe hypoxia). Significant hypercarbia and acidosis occurred in both the translaryngeal technique group and the forceps-dilational technique group. A significant decrease in Pao2 was observed in the translaryngeal technique group (311 to 261, p =.0069). No bleeding requiring intervention occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Serious complications related to percutaneous tracheostomy occurred in 8.5% and 1.8% of the cases in the translaryngeal technique and the forceps-dilational technique group, respectively (p <.001). Technical difficulties were not rare when using the translaryngeal technique (23%). On the basis of our results, we concluded that the forceps-dilation technique is superior to the translaryngeal technique, with fewer technical difficulties and fewer complications for critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11940751     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200204000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  10 in total

1.  Fantoni translaryngeal tracheostomy versus ciaglia blue rhino percutaneous tracheostomy: a retrospective comparison.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Giuseppe Altamura; Sergio Di Tommaso; Gabriella Di Leonardo; Emilio Rosa; Carlo De Sanctis; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  [Dilatation tracheotomy update : indications, limitations and management of complications].

Authors:  S Koscielny; O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Evolution of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy--a review of current techniques and their pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Ali Aboalsaud; Heather Gill; Lorenzo Ferri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  State of the art: percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Christian Ghattas; Sammar Alsunaid; Edward M Pickering; Van K Holden
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 3.005

5.  Subglottic stenosis following percutaneous tracheostomy: a single centre report as a descriptive study.

Authors:  K Karvandian; A Jafarzadeh; A Hajipour; N Zolfaghari
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christian Putensen; Nils Theuerkauf; Ulf Guenther; Maria Vargas; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Tracheostomy must be individualized!

Authors:  Paolo Pelosi; Paolo Severgnini
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Comparison of complications in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy.

Authors:  Siamak Yaghoobi; Hamid Kayalha; Raziyeh Ghafouri; Zohreh Yazdi; Marzieh Beigom Khezri
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-04-20

Review 9.  Tracheotomy in the intensive care unit: guidelines from a French expert panel.

Authors:  Jean Louis Trouillet; Olivier Collange; Fouad Belafia; François Blot; Gilles Capellier; Eric Cesareo; Jean-Michel Constantin; Alexandre Demoule; Jean-Luc Diehl; Pierre-Grégoire Guinot; Franck Jegoux; Erwan L'Her; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Yazine Mahjoub; Julien Mayaux; Hervé Quintard; François Ravat; Sebastien Vergez; Julien Amour; Max Guillot
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Tracheostomy in Adult Intensive Care Unit: An ISCCM Expert Panel Practice Recommendations.

Authors:  Sachin Gupta; Subhal Dixit; Dhruva Choudhry; Deepak Govil; Rajesh Chandra Mishra; Srinivas Samavedam; Kapil Zirpe; Shrikanth Srinivasan; Zubair Mohamed; Kv Venkatesha Gupta; Jaya Wanchoo; Nilanchal Chakrabortty; Sushma Gurav
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.