Literature DB >> 11940618

Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques.

Jarmo A K Toivanen1, Olli Väistö, Pekka Kannus, Kyösti Latvala, Seppo E Honkonen, Markku J Järvinen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain is the most common complication after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. Dissection of the patellar tendon and its sheath during nailing is thought to be a contributing cause of chronic anterior knee pain. The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to assess whether the prevalence or the intensity of anterior knee pain following intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture is reduced by the use of a paratendinous incision for the nail entry portal.
METHODS: Fifty patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring intramedullary nailing were randomized equally to treatment with paratendinous or transtendinous nailing. Twenty-one patients from both study groups were followed for an average of three years after nailing. After fracture union, all but two patients had elective nail removal through the same surgical approach as was used for the nailing. At the follow-up evaluation, the patients used visual analog scales to report their level of anterior knee pain and the impairment caused by that pain. The scales described by Lysholm and Gillquist and by Tegner et al., the Iowa knee scoring system, and simple functional tests were used to quantitate the functional results. Isokinetic thigh-muscle strength was also measured.
RESULTS: Fourteen (67%) of the twenty-one patients treated with transtendinous nailing reported anterior knee pain at the final evaluation. Of these fourteen patients, thirteen were mildly to severely impaired by the pain. Fifteen (71%) of the twenty-one patients treated with paratendinous nailing reported anterior knee pain, and ten of the fifteen were impaired by the pain. The Lysholm, Tegner, and Iowa knee scoring systems; muscle-strength measurements; and functional tests showed no significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Compared with a transpatellar tendon approach, a paratendinous approach for nail insertion does not reduce the prevalence of chronic anterior knee pain or functional impairment by a clinically relevant amount after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11940618     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200204000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  45 in total

1.  Backstroke technique: an effective way to improve the healing of tibia fracture.

Authors:  Qi Lee; Bing-Fang Zeng; Cong-Feng Luo; Jin-Wu Wang; Nan-Ji Lu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  MRI of the knee after locked unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibia.

Authors:  Johan Gustafsson; Sören Toksvig-Larsen; Kjell Jonsson
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-02-10

3.  Precise nail tip positioning after tibial intramedullary nailing prevents anterior knee pain.

Authors:  Nikica Daraboš; Tihomir Banić; Zvonimir Lubina; Anela Daraboš; Vide Bilić; Srećko Sabalić
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A new angle stable nailing concept for the treatment of distal tibia fractures.

Authors:  Sebastian Kuhn; Philipp Appelmann; Philip Pairon; Dorothea Mehler; Frank Hartmann; Pol M Rommens
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Influence of sagittal plane malpositioning of the patella on anterior knee pain after tibia intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Ismail Turkmen; Yavuz Saglam; Fatih Turkmensoy; Bahattin Kemah; Adnan Kara; Koray Unay
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  Character, Incidence, and Predictors of Knee Pain and Activity After Infrapatellar Intramedullary Nailing of an Isolated Tibia Fracture.

Authors:  William Obremskey; Julie Agel; Kristin Archer; Philip To; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Reaming Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes After Open and Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carol A Lin; Marc Swiontkowski; Mohit Bhandari; Stephen D Walter; Emil H Schemitsch; David Sanders; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  George W Wood
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  Yongchuan Li; Xi Jiang; Qinghe Guo; Lei Zhu; Tianwen Ye; Aimin Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial diaphyseal fractures and aseptic nonunions. Can we expect an optimum result?

Authors:  Byron E Chalidis; George E Petsatodis; Nick C Sachinis; Christos G Dimitriou; Anastasios G Christodoulou
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2009-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.