Literature DB >> 19308356

Radiological evaluation of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundle insertion sites of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Stephan Lorenz1, Florian Elser, Peter U Brucker, Tobias Obst, Andreas B Imhoff.   

Abstract

The optimal technique of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is still controversial. Besides different parameters as surgical technique and graft choice, the exact anatomic placement of the graft is essential for successful reconstruction of the PCL. For intraoperative control and postoperative radiological evaluation of the anatomical placement of the anterolatelateral (ALB) and posteromedial bundle (PMB) of the PCL, the radiological localization of both functional bundles of the PCL has yet to be determined. Therefore, in this descriptive laboratory study, the insertion sites of the ALB and PMB of the PCL on the femur and the common tibial insertion site were macroscopically identified and marked with copper wires in 16 human cadaver specimens. Radiological evaluation of the femoral insertion sites of the ALB and PMB in AP full extension and true lateral radiography was performed using an angle segment transformation based on the tangent of the femoral condyles and a modified reticule system of the quadrant method, respectively. On the tibial site, the footprint of the PCL was defined as ratios of the geometric insertion site with respect to the mediolateral and sagittal diameter of the tibia in AP and true lateral radiography. Femorally, the geometric insertion points of the ALB and PMB were located on the reticule at x = 62 +/- 3%/y = 16 +/- 6% and x = 51 +/- 5%/y = 35 +/- 7%, respectively; the angle segments for the PMB were between 40 +/- 5 degrees and 56 +/- 6 degrees and for the ALB were between 56 +/- 6 degrees and 76 +/- 7 degrees. Tibially, the common insertion point of the PCL was located at 51 +/- 2% of the mediolateral diameter of the tibial plateau with respect to the lateral border and 13 +/- 2% inferiorly to the medial tibial plateau with respect to the sagittal diameter of the tibial plateau. In conclusion, the knowledge of the anatomical insertion sites of the PCL in standardized radiography may help the orthopaedic surgeon for correct intraoperative placement and postoperative evaluation of the tunnel placement. In addition, the data might be a useful tool for fluoroscopic-based navigation in PCL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19308356     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0770-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  C D Harner; M A Janaushek; A Kanamori; M Yagi; T M Vogrin; S L Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  J Robert Giffin; Marcus J Haemmerle; Tracy M Vogrin; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 3.  Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I: The posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  E S Grood; M S Hefzy; T N Lindenfield
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system.

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Simon Lenschow; Andre Weimann; Michael J Strobel; Michael J Raschke; Thore Zantop
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion.

Authors:  Ramprasad Papannagari; Louis E DeFrate; Kyung W Nha; Jeremy M Moses; Mohamed Moussa; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Andrew Edwards; Anthony M J Bull; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 'isometric' versus single and double-bundled 'anatomic' grafts.

Authors:  A Race; A A Amis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

8.  Loading of the two bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an analysis of bundle function in a-P drawer.

Authors:  A Race; A A Amis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Posterior cruciate ligament tibial attachment anatomy and radiographic landmarks for tibial tunnel placement in PCL reconstruction.

Authors:  J A Racanelli; D Drez
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel E Cooper; Donna Stewart
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  16 in total

1.  The isometry of two different paths for remnant-preserving posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Jung; Jin Hong Kim; Han Jun Lee; Seungbum Koo; Seung-Hwan Chang; Young Bok Jung; Sang Hak Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Double-bundle technique--anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament].

Authors:  Alexander C Rauch; Philip B Schöttle; Knut Beitzel; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Computed tomography evaluation of the femoral and tibial attachments of the posterior cruciate ligament in vitro.

Authors:  Philippe Greiner; Robert A Magnussen; Sébastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Philippe Neyret; Elvire Servien
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The predictive effect of anatomic femoral and tibial graft tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on functional and radiological outcome.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Doris Hierzer; Alessa Krawinkel; Thomas Hoffelner; Karl Peter Benedetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Attachments of separate small bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Daisuke Hatsushika; Akimoto Nimura; Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Kumiko Yamaguchi; Takeshi Muneta; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Skeletal imaging following reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: in vivo comparison of fluoroscopy, radiography, and computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Alessa Krawinkel; Karl Peter Benedetto
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The posterior cruciate ligament: a study on its bony and soft tissue anatomy using novel 3D CT technology.

Authors:  Tom Van Hoof; Michiel Cromheecke; Thomas Tampere; Katharina D'herde; Jan Victor; Peter C M Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The evolution of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Alan Getgood; Tim Spalding
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-07-27

9.  Anatomical study of the posterior cruciate ligament with the knee flexed at 90°.

Authors:  Daniel Kyubin Cho; Sthéphano Pellizzaro Rosa; Guilherme Bello Prestes; Luiz Antônio Munhoz da Cunha; Márcio Fernando Aparecido de Moura; Edmar Stieven Filho
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-08-27

10.  Radiographic study on the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Julio Cesar Gali; Paulo Esquerdo; Marco Antonio Pires Almagro; Phelipe Augusto Cintra da Silva
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.