Literature DB >> 11939914

Effect of sevoflurane on the mid-latency auditory evoked potentials measured by a new fast extracting monitor.

S Alpiger1, H S Helbo-Hansen, E W Jensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) are widely suppressed during general anesthesia and may therefore be useful for assessment of the depth of anesthesia. However, interpretation of amplitudes and latencies in the AEP signal is time consuming. A new monitor (A-line) that quantifies the MLAEP into an index has therefore been developed. The present study aimed to assess the precision of a prototype of the new monitor and to test the hypothesis that the depth of anesthesia index shows a graded response with changing steady-state end-expiratory concentrations of sevoflurane.
METHODS: We studied 10 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing elective hysterectomy under combined epidural and general anesthesia by sevoflurane. Baseline auditory evoked potentials were recorded in the conscious patient immediately before induction of general anesthesia. Depth of anesthesia indices were recorded before anesthesia and at decreasing end-expiratory steady-state sevoflurane concentrations of 2.0%, 1.5%, 1.0% and 0.5%. All indices were recorded in duplicate 6 s apart. By use of an autoregressive model with exogenous input (ARX-model), the monitor extracted the AEP within 6 s. The depth of anesthesia AEP index calculated in this way was defined as the A-line ARX index (AAI).
RESULTS: Approximately 95% of the differences between repeated recordings were 5 AAI-units or less. A wide interindividual variation was observed at each observation point. AAI at 1%, 1.5% and 2% end-expiratory concentration was significantly less than the baseline AAI obtained before induction of anesthesia (P < 0.001). AAI did not change significantly in the 1-2% concentration range.
CONCLUSION: The new monitor was precise. Attenuation of the A-line ARX-index (AAI) for mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) during general anesthesia was profound. However, the monitor did not show a graded response with changing end-expiratory steady-state concentrations of sevoflurane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11939914     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460305.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Measurement of the depth of anaesthesia].

Authors:  G N Schmidt; J Müller; P Bischoff
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Composite-, plain-auditory evoked potentials index and bispectral index to measure the effects of sevoflurane.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Correlation beween AAI-index and the BIS-index during propofol hypnosis: a clinical study.

Authors:  Russell E Anderson; Gunilla Barr; Jan G Jakobsson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses.

Authors:  Bowan Huang; Feixue Liang; Lei Zhong; Minlin Lin; Juan Yang; Linqing Yan; Jinfan Xiao; Zhongju Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Auditory middle latency evoked responses: a standardizing study.

Authors:  Francisco Sales de Almeida; Paulo Roberto Pialarissi; Luiz Eduardo Ferreira Paiva Júnior; Maria Aparecida Oliveira Almeida; André Silva
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.