Literature DB >> 11937124

A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer.

Claudine C Hunault1, Marinus J C Eijkemans, Math H E C Pieters, Egbert R te Velde, J Dik F Habbema, Bart C J M Fauser, Nicholas S Macklon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Construction of a prediction model to enable the selection of patients for elective single ET.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Fertility center in a tertiary referral university hospital. PATIENT(S): Six hundred forty-two women undergoing their first IVF treatment cycle in which no more than two embryos were transferred. INTERVENTION(S): Database analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy and multiple pregnancy. RESULT(S): In multivariate analysis, the best predictors for ongoing pregnancy were female age, the number of retrieved oocytes, the developmental stage score and the morphology score of the two best embryos available for transfer, and the day of transfer. Younger age and high quality of transferred embryos were the best predictors for increased risk of multiple pregnancy. The resulting model enables the calculation of probabilities of pregnancy and twin pregnancy. Depending on embryo quality, there is a threshold age under which the chance of singleton pregnancy is higher if one embryo is transferred compared with two embryos. CONCLUSION(S): Application of this model may enable a reduction in the chance of twin pregnancy without compromising singleton pregnancy rates in a subgroup of patients undergoing IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11937124     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03243-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  32 in total

1.  The added value of embryo cryopreservation to cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates per IVF treatment: is cryopreservation worth the effort?

Authors:  D de Jong; M J C Eijkemans; N G M Beckers; R V Pruijsten; B C J M Fauser; N S Macklon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy outcome and live birth after IVF and ICSI according to embryo quality.

Authors:  Patricia Fauque; Roger Léandri; Françoise Merlet; Jean-Claude Juillard; Sylvie Epelboin; Juliette Guibert; Pierre Jouannet; Catherine Patrat
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The role of serum AMH and FF AMH in predicting pregnancy outcome in the fresh cycle of IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingnv Yao; Wei Zhang; Hong Li; Wenqin Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

4.  To what extent does Anti-Mullerian Hormone contribute to a better prediction of live birth after IVF?

Authors:  Catherine Rongieres; Carolina Colella; Philippe Lehert
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Factors predicting double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology: implications for elective single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Caitlin Martin; Jeani Chang; Sheree Boulet; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry Kissin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Defining women who are prone to have twins in in vitro fertilization--a necessary step towards single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Dan Hellberg; Maria Blennborn; Staffan Nilsson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Can Ratios Between Prognostic Factors Predict the Clinical Pregnancy Rate in an IVF/ICSI Program with a GnRH Agonist-FSH/hMG Protocol? An Assessment of 2421 Embryo Transfers, and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Michel Menard; Rosalie Cabry; Florence Scheffler; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Marie-Thérèse Le Martelot; Sylvie Roche; Jean-Jacques Chabaud; Henri Copin; Hortense Drapier; Moncef Benkhalifa; Damien Beauvillard
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Sperm function and assisted reproduction technology.

Authors:  Ralf Henkel; Gesa MAAß; Rolf-Hasso Bödeker; Christine Scheibelhut; Thomas Stalf; Claas Mehnert; Hans-Christian Schuppe; Andreas Jung; Wolf-Bernhard Schill
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2005-03-07

10.  Second try: who returns for additional assisted reproductive technology treatment and the effect of a prior assisted reproductive technology birth.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Valerie L Baker; Daniel R Grow; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.