Christina Gerth1, Susan M Garcia, Lei Ma, John L Keltner, John S Werner. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California-Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 2400, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. cgerth@ucdavis.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Age-related changes in the first-order multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) responses were measured for two different luminance levels (200 and 700 cd.m(-2)). The relative contribution of optical and neural factors to senescent change in response was evaluated. METHODS: Data were obtained from one eye of each of 71 normal phakic subjects, age 9-80 years. The mfERG responses were recorded with the 7" stimulus-refractor unit (EDI) and VERIS 4.3 using the following protocol: bipolar contact lens, 103 hexagons, consecutive stimulation with 200 and 700 cd.m(-2), pupils > or =6 mm, amplification of 10(5), filter cut-offs at 10 and 300 Hz. RESULTS: Age-correlated decreases in amplitude and response density and increases in P1 implicit time were found for both luminance levels. The mean response density (nV.deg(-2)) was higher for the 700 cd.m(-2) stimulus, but the rate of change with age was not significantly different from that obtained with the 200 cd.m(-2) stimulus. Implicit time was not significantly different for the two light levels, nor was the rate of change with age. The decrease in response density and the increase in implicit time with age were significant across all retinal regions, dividing the 50 deg stimulus into six concentric rings. Age-related change in response density was greatest for the central retina and decreased with increasing retinal eccentricity. CONCLUSION: Log mfERG response changes linearly as a function of age. Analyses of the effects of reduced ocular media transmission and increased stray light, along with ancillary data obtained from pseudophakes, imply that age-related changes in the mfERG are due to both optical and neural factors.
BACKGROUND: Age-related changes in the first-order multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) responses were measured for two different luminance levels (200 and 700 cd.m(-2)). The relative contribution of optical and neural factors to senescent change in response was evaluated. METHODS: Data were obtained from one eye of each of 71 normal phakic subjects, age 9-80 years. The mfERG responses were recorded with the 7" stimulus-refractor unit (EDI) and VERIS 4.3 using the following protocol: bipolar contact lens, 103 hexagons, consecutive stimulation with 200 and 700 cd.m(-2), pupils > or =6 mm, amplification of 10(5), filter cut-offs at 10 and 300 Hz. RESULTS: Age-correlated decreases in amplitude and response density and increases in P1 implicit time were found for both luminance levels. The mean response density (nV.deg(-2)) was higher for the 700 cd.m(-2) stimulus, but the rate of change with age was not significantly different from that obtained with the 200 cd.m(-2) stimulus. Implicit time was not significantly different for the two light levels, nor was the rate of change with age. The decrease in response density and the increase in implicit time with age were significant across all retinal regions, dividing the 50 deg stimulus into six concentric rings. Age-related change in response density was greatest for the central retina and decreased with increasing retinal eccentricity. CONCLUSION: Log mfERG response changes linearly as a function of age. Analyses of the effects of reduced ocular media transmission and increased stray light, along with ancillary data obtained from pseudophakes, imply that age-related changes in the mfERG are due to both optical and neural factors.
Authors: Gregory R Jackson; JulioDeLeon Ortega; Christopher Girkin; Carol E Rosenstiel; Cynthia Owsley Journal: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Michael F Marmor; Donald C Hood; David Keating; Mineo Kondo; Mathias W Seeliger; Yozo Miyake Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Steven M Jones; John L Keltner; Scot S Olivier; John S Werner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Janet P Szlyk; Thasarat S Vajaranant; Rimki Rana; Wico W Lai; Jose S Pulido; Jennifer Paliga; Norman P Blair; William Seiple Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2005 Mar-May Impact factor: 2.379