Literature DB >> 11935277

Multifocal electroretinogram: age-related changes for different luminance levels.

Christina Gerth1, Susan M Garcia, Lei Ma, John L Keltner, John S Werner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age-related changes in the first-order multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) responses were measured for two different luminance levels (200 and 700 cd.m(-2)). The relative contribution of optical and neural factors to senescent change in response was evaluated.
METHODS: Data were obtained from one eye of each of 71 normal phakic subjects, age 9-80 years. The mfERG responses were recorded with the 7" stimulus-refractor unit (EDI) and VERIS 4.3 using the following protocol: bipolar contact lens, 103 hexagons, consecutive stimulation with 200 and 700 cd.m(-2), pupils > or =6 mm, amplification of 10(5), filter cut-offs at 10 and 300 Hz.
RESULTS: Age-correlated decreases in amplitude and response density and increases in P1 implicit time were found for both luminance levels. The mean response density (nV.deg(-2)) was higher for the 700 cd.m(-2) stimulus, but the rate of change with age was not significantly different from that obtained with the 200 cd.m(-2) stimulus. Implicit time was not significantly different for the two light levels, nor was the rate of change with age. The decrease in response density and the increase in implicit time with age were significant across all retinal regions, dividing the 50 deg stimulus into six concentric rings. Age-related change in response density was greatest for the central retina and decreased with increasing retinal eccentricity.
CONCLUSION: Log mfERG response changes linearly as a function of age. Analyses of the effects of reduced ocular media transmission and increased stray light, along with ancillary data obtained from pseudophakes, imply that age-related changes in the mfERG are due to both optical and neural factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11935277      PMCID: PMC2570348          DOI: 10.1007/s00417-002-0442-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  23 in total

1.  Influence of age on the multifocal electroretinography.

Authors:  N Mohidin; M K Yap; R J Jacobs
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Senescence of foveal and parafoveal cone sensitivities and their relations to macular pigment density.

Authors:  J S Werner; M L Bieber; B E Schefrin
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Decline of photopic multifocal electroretinogram responses with age is due primarily to preretinal optical factors.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Aging-related changes in the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Gregory R Jackson; JulioDeLeon Ortega; Christopher Girkin; Carol E Rosenstiel; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Topography of the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  W A Verdon; G Haegerstrom-Portnoy
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG).

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Donald C Hood; David Keating; Mineo Kondo; Mathias W Seeliger; Yozo Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Glare and age.

Authors:  E WOLF
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1960-10

8.  The effect of age on the light scattering characteristics of the eye.

Authors:  M L Hennelly; J L Barbur; D F Edgar; E G Woodward
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Multifocal electroretinograms in normal subjects.

Authors:  A Nagatomo; N Nao-i; F Maruiwa; M Arai; A Sawada
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  The normal B-potential in the single-flash clinical electroretinogram. A computer technique study of the influence of sex and age.

Authors:  H Peterson
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1968
View more
  23 in total

1.  In vivo imaging of the photoreceptor mosaic in retinal dystrophies and correlations with visual function.

Authors:  Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Steven M Jones; John L Keltner; Scot S Olivier; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  mfERG response dynamics of the aging retina.

Authors:  Christina Gerth; Erich E Sutter; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Senescence of human multifocal electroretinogram components: a localized approach.

Authors:  Radouil T Tzekov; Christina Gerth; John S Werner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  A comparison of pattern and multifocal electroretinography in the evaluation of age-related macular degeneration and its treatment with photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Magella M Neveu; Adnan Tufail; Jonathan G Dowler; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  30 Hz-flicker mfERG in primary open-angle glaucoma patients : 30 Hz-flicker-mfERG in POAG.

Authors:  Margarita G Todorova; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe; Selim Orguel; Josef Flammer
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Assessing responses of the macula in patients with macular holes using a new system measuring localized visual acuity and the mfERG.

Authors:  Janet P Szlyk; Thasarat S Vajaranant; Rimki Rana; Wico W Lai; Jose S Pulido; Jennifer Paliga; Norman P Blair; William Seiple
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Mar-May       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Multifocal ERG in subjects with a history of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Anne B Fulton; Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; Amber M Barnaby
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  The influence of luminance on the multifocal ERG.

Authors:  Thilo Schimitzek; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Cone-mediated multifocal electroretinogram in age-related macular degeneration: progression over a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Christina Gerth; Peter B Delahunt; Suhail Alam; Lawrence S Morse; John S Werner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03

10.  Assessment of multifocal electroretinogram abnormalities and their relation to morphologic characteristics in patients with large drusen.

Authors:  Christina Gerth; David Hauser; Peter B Delahunt; Lawrence S Morse; John S Werner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.