Literature DB >> 11935101

Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation: a biomechanical analysis.

Ronald A Lehman1, Timothy R Kuklo, Philip J Belmont, Romney C Andersen, David W Polly.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical study of human cadaveric sacra using insertional torque and bone mineral density was conducted to determine the optimal sagittal trajectory of S1 pedicle screws.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the maximal insertional torque of sacral promontory versus bicortical pedicle screw fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Fixation of instrumentation to the sacrum is commonly accomplished using S1 pedicle screws, with previous studies reporting biomechanical advantages of bicortical over unicortical S1 screws. The biomechanical effect of bicortical screws (paralleling the endplate) versus screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory is unknown.
METHODS: For this study, 10 fresh frozen cadaver sacra were harvested and evaluated with dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry to assess bone mineral density. Matched 7.5-mm monoaxial stainless steel pedicle screws then were randomly assigned by side (left versus right) and placed bicortically or into the apex of the sacral promontory under direct visualization. Maximum insertional torque was recorded for each screw revolution with a digital torque wrench (TQJE1500, Snap-On Tools, Kenosha, WI).
RESULTS: Maximum bicortical S1 screw insertional torque averaged 5.22 +/- 0.83 inch-pounds, as compared with the maximum sacral promontory S1 screw insertional torque of 10.34 +/- 1.94 inch-pounds. This resulted in a 99% increase in maximum insertional torque (P = 0.005) using the "tricortical" technique, with the screw directed into the sacral promontory. Mean bone mineral density was 940 +/- 0.25 mg/cm2 (range, 507-1428 mg/cm2). The bone mineral density correlated with maximal insertional torque for the sacral promontory technique (r = 0.806; P = 0.005), but not for the bicortical technique (r = 0.48; P = 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: The screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory of the S1 pedicle resulted in an average 99% increase in peak insertional torque (P = 0.005), as compared with bicortical S1 pedicle screw fixation. Tricortical pedicle screw fixation correlates directly with bone mineral density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11935101     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  A study of sacral anthropometry to determine S1 screw placement for spinal lumbosacral fixation in the Korean population.

Authors:  Young-Yul Kim; Kee-Yong Ha; Sang-Il Kim; In-Soo Oh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Morphometry of the sacrum for clinical use.

Authors:  H Başaloğlu; M Turgut; F A Taşer; T Ceylan; H K Başaloğlu; A A Ceylan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Neurovascular risks of sacral screws with bicortical purchase: an anatomical study.

Authors:  Ipek Ergur; Omer Akcali; Amac Kiray; Can Kosay; Hamid Tayefi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The sacral screw placement depending on morphological and anatomical peculiarities.

Authors:  Carolin Meyer; Peter Pfannebecker; Jan Siewe; David Grevenstein; Jan Bredow; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  A mid-term follow-up result of spinopelvic fixation using iliac screws for lumbosacral fusion.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Seung-Chul Rhim; Yongjung J Kim; Young-Bae Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-10-30

Review 6.  Pelvic fixation for adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Francis H Shen; Jonathan R Mason; Adam L Shimer; Vincent M Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density-applications in spine surgery].

Authors:  Max J Scheyerer; Bernhard Ullrich; Georg Osterhoff; Ulrich A Spiegl; Klaus J Schnake
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  L5 spinal nerve injury caused by misplacement of outwardly-inserted S1 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Masahiro Inoue; Gen Inoue; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Hiroto Kamoda; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Miyako Suzuki; Yoshihiro Sakuma; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Sumihisa Orita; Masashi Takaso; Tomoaki Toyone; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Three-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws in L4-L5-S1 fixation: single-centre experience of pedicular accuracy and S1 cortical fixation of 810 screws.

Authors:  Manuel García-Fantini; Ricardo De Casas
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

10.  Early Medical Complications and Delayed Discharge after Spinopelvic Fusion: A Comparative Analysis of 887 NSQIP Cases from 2006 to 2016.

Authors:  Zachary T Sharfman; Yaroslav Gelfand; Priyam Shah; Ari J Holtzman; Joseph R Mendelis; Neel Shah; Jonathan Krystal; Reza Yassari; David C Kramer
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2020-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.