Literature DB >> 11934410

Why mechanobiology? A survey article.

Marjolein C H van der Meulen1, Rik Huiskes.   

Abstract

The central paradigm of skeletal mechanobiology is that mechanical forces modulate morphological and structural fitness of the skeletal tissues-bone, cartilage, ligament and tendon. Traditionally, skeletal biomechanics has focussed on how these tissues perform the structural and locomotory functions of the vertebrate skeleton. In mechanobiology the central question is how these same load-bearing tissues are produced, maintained and adapted by cells as an active response to biophysical stimuli in their environment. The idea that 'form follows function' is not new, but we now believe that the scientific community has the knowledge and tools to prove, understand and use functional adaptation to benefit medicine and human health. In this Survey Article the philosophy and progress of skeletal mechanobiology are discussed. The revival of this science, with roots dating back to the 19th Century, is now driven by new developments in cellular, molecular and computational technologies. These developments are still in an early stage of application, but if modern mechanobiology fulfills the promises of its ambitions, the results will bring great benefits to tissue engineering and to the treatment and prevention of skeletal conditions such as congenital deformities, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and bone fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11934410     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00184-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  Mechanobiological bone growth: comparative analysis of two biomechanical modeling approaches.

Authors:  Hui Lin; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Isabelle Villemure
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  "May the force be with you": 14th Samuel Haughton lecture.

Authors:  P J Prendergast
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Tissue-to-cellular level deformation coupling in cell micro-integrated elastomeric scaffolds.

Authors:  John A Stella; Jun Liao; Yi Hong; W David Merryman; William R Wagner; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Mechanical Signals As a Non-Invasive Means to Influence Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate, Promoting Bone and Suppressing the Fat Phenotype.

Authors:  Yen K Luu; Jeffrey E Pessin; Stefan Judex; Janet Rubin; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Bonekey Osteovision       Date:  2009-04-01

5.  Introduction to the European Society of Biomechanics.

Authors:  María Angeles Pérez
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2019-09-07

6.  Variation in within-bone stiffness measured by nanoindentation in mice bred for high levels of voluntary wheel running.

Authors:  Kevin M Middleton; Beth D Goldstein; Pradeep R Guduru; Julie F Waters; Scott A Kelly; Sharon M Swartz; T Garland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Tissue-level remodeling simulations of cancellous bone capture effects of in vivo loading in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Timothy G Morgan; Mathias P G Bostrom; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Anatomic variation in the elastic anisotropy of cortical bone tissue in the human femur.

Authors:  Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Justin M Deuerling; Matthew D Landrigan; John E Renaud; Ryan K Roeder
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-09-06

9.  The mechanical consequences of load bearing in the equine third metacarpal across speed and gait: the nonuniform distributions of normal strain, shear strain, and strain energy density.

Authors:  Clinton T Rubin; Howard Seeherman; Yi-Xian Qin; Ted S Gross
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  On the biomechanical function of scaffolds for engineering load-bearing soft tissues.

Authors:  John A Stella; Antonio D'Amore; William R Wagner; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.