Literature DB >> 20060509

On the biomechanical function of scaffolds for engineering load-bearing soft tissues.

John A Stella1, Antonio D'Amore, William R Wagner, Michael S Sacks.   

Abstract

Replacement or regeneration of load-bearing soft tissues has long been the impetus for the development of bioactive materials. While maturing, current efforts continue to be confounded by our lack of understanding of the intricate multi-scale hierarchical arrangements and interactions typically found in native tissues. The current state of the art in biomaterial processing enables a degree of controllable microstructure that can be used for the development of model systems to deduce fundamental biological implications of matrix morphologies on cell function. Furthermore, the development of computational frameworks which allow for the simulation of experimentally derived observations represents a positive departure from what has mostly been an empirically driven field, enabling a deeper understanding of the highly complex biological mechanisms we wish to ultimately emulate. Ongoing research is actively pursuing new materials and processing methods to control material structure down to the micro-scale to sustain or improve cell viability, guide tissue growth, and provide mechanical integrity, all while exhibiting the capacity to degrade in a controlled manner. The purpose of this review is not to focus solely on material processing but to assess the ability of these techniques to produce mechanically sound tissue surrogates, highlight the unique structural characteristics produced in these materials, and discuss how this translates to distinct macroscopic biomechanical behaviors. Copyright 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20060509      PMCID: PMC2878661          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  150 in total

Review 1.  The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part II. Rapid prototyping techniques.

Authors:  Shoufeng Yang; Kah-Fai Leong; Zhaohui Du; Chee-Kai Chua
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2002-02

Review 2.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Degradation and remodeling of small intestinal submucosa in canine Achilles tendon repair.

Authors:  Thomas W Gilbert; Ann M Stewart-Akers; Abby Simmons-Byrd; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Nanofiber technology: designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Catherine P Barnes; Scott A Sell; Eugene D Boland; David G Simpson; Gary L Bowlin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Design and analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds that mimic soft tissue mechanical anisotropy.

Authors:  Todd Courtney; Michael S Sacks; John Stankus; Jianjun Guan; William R Wagner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Hepatocyte attachment on biodegradable modified chitosan membranes: in vitro evaluation for the development of liver organoids.

Authors:  Y M Elçin; V Dixit; G Gitnick
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.094

7.  Schwann cell behavior in three-dimensional collagen gels: evidence for differential mechano-transduction and the influence of TGF-beta 1 in morphological polarization and differentiation.

Authors:  B I Rosner; T Hang; R T Tranquillo
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Ming Pei; Luis A Solchaga; Joachim Seidel; Li Zeng; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Arnold I Caplan; Lisa E Freed
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Effects of decellularization on the mechanical and structural properties of the porcine aortic valve leaflet.

Authors:  Jun Liao; Erinn M Joyce; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Phase separation, pore structure, and properties of nanofibrous gelatin scaffolds.

Authors:  Xiaohua Liu; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  EMT-inducing biomaterials for heart valve engineering: taking cues from developmental biology.

Authors:  M K Sewell-Loftin; Young Wook Chun; Ali Khademhosseini; W David Merryman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Improved cellular infiltration in electrospun fiber via engineered porosity.

Authors:  Jin Nam; Yan Huang; Sudha Agarwal; John Lannutti
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-09

3.  Preparation and characterization of an advanced medical device for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Rossella Dorati; Claudia Colonna; Ida Genta; Giovanna Bruni; Livia Visai; Bice Conti
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 4.  How to make a heart valve: from embryonic development to bioengineering of living valve substitutes.

Authors:  Donal MacGrogan; Guillermo Luxán; Anita Driessen-Mol; Carlijn Bouten; Frank Baaijens; José Luis de la Pompa
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  From single fiber to macro-level mechanics: A structural finite-element model for elastomeric fibrous biomaterials.

Authors:  Antonio D'Amore; Nicholas Amoroso; Riccardo Gottardi; Christopher Hobson; Christopher Carruthers; Simon Watkins; William R Wagner; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-08-01

6.  Geometric characterization and simulation of planar layered elastomeric fibrous biomaterials.

Authors:  James B Carleton; Antonio D'Amore; Kristen R Feaver; Gregory J Rodin; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Crimped Nanofibrous Biomaterials Mimic Microstructure and Mechanics of Native Tissue and Alter Strain Transfer to Cells.

Authors:  Spencer E Szczesny; Tristan P Driscoll; Hsiao-Yun Tseng; Pang-Ching Liu; Su-Jin Heo; Robert L Mauck; Pen-Hsiu G Chao
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-12-08

8.  Characterization of the complete fiber network topology of planar fibrous tissues and scaffolds.

Authors:  Antonio D'Amore; John A Stella; William R Wagner; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Heart valve scaffold fabrication: Bioinspired control of macro-scale morphology, mechanics and micro-structure.

Authors:  Antonio D'Amore; Samuel K Luketich; Giuseppe M Raffa; Salim Olia; Giorgio Menallo; Antonino Mazzola; Flavio D'Accardi; Tamir Grunberg; Xinzhu Gu; Michele Pilato; Marina V Kameneva; Vinay Badhwar; William R Wagner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Recovery property of double-network hydrogel containing mussel-inspired adhesive moiety and nano-silicate.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Bruce P Lee
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 6.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.