Literature DB >> 11931941

Line bisection in normal adults: direction of attentional bias for near and far space.

A Varnava1, M McCarthy, J G Beaumont.   

Abstract

The direction of attentional bias in forty normal adults was assessed using a computer generated line bisection task. A 4 (viewing distance)x4 (line length)x2 (cursor starting position) repeated measures factorial design was employed. As predicted, differences in bisection performance as a function of viewing distance were observed. The findings confirmed that scanning direction (contingent upon the starting position of the cursor), but not line length, significantly modulated this effect. The direction of bias across near and far space was further clarified yielding a progressive shift from a leftward bias in near space to a rightward bias in far space. A significant interaction of distance, line length and starting position revealed differential effects for left and right starting positions as a function of viewing distance and line length. More specifically, a leftward start witnessed deviations shifting progressively from left-to-right as distance and line length increased though no comparable pattern was observed for rightward starts. The results provide important behavioural support for the suggestion that dissociated neural systems may be responsible for attending and acting in near and far space and that other lateralised functions (such as scanning strategies) can influence hemispheric activation. The findings have relevant theoretical implications as well as important implications for the clinical assessment of unilateral neglect using a standard line bisection task, both of which are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11931941     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00204-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  24 in total

1.  Line copying: distinct "where" and "aiming" spatial bias in healthy adults.

Authors:  Priyanka P Shah; Keith O Gonzalez; A M Barrett
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Space perception and body morphology: extent of near space scales with arm length.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Stella F Lourenco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space.

Authors:  John P Garza; Paul J Eslinger; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Remote hand: Hand-centered peripersonal space transfers to a disconnected hand avatar.

Authors:  Daisuke Mine; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  How tool use and arm position affect peripersonal space representation.

Authors:  Bruno Seraglia; Konstantinos Priftis; Simone Cutini; Luciano Gamberini
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

6.  Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?

Authors:  A Drakul; C J Bockisch; A A Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Disconnected hand avatar can be integrated into the peripersonal space.

Authors:  Daisuke Mine; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Decreased leftward 'aiming' motor-intentional spatial cuing in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Daymond Wagner; Paul J Eslinger; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Is it what you see, or how you say it? Spatial bias in young and aged subjects.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; Catherine E Craver-Lemley
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Monocular patching may induce ipsilateral "where" spatial bias.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Lillian Erdahl; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.