SETTING: Tertiary care referral centre specialising in respiratory diseases. OBJECTIVES: Chest radiography is a major screening and diagnostic tool for tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated the reproducibility of a radiographic classification system for screening for active TB of immigration applicants to Canada. We also evaluated the validity of this classification system for detection of prevalent active TB among the screened applicants, as well as tuberculin-positive close contacts and symptomatic patients. METHODS: Reproducibility was assessed by re-reading a randomly selected 10% sample of screening chest films. Validity was estimated from the final clinical and microbiologic diagnosis of patients undergoing detailed clinical evaluation. RESULTS: Inter-reader agreement using five broad categories was moderate (kappas of 0.44-0.56), while intra-reader agreement was substantial (kappas of 0.59-0.72). After adjustment for age and patient group, the adjusted odds of active tuberculosis, relative to normal or minor findings or granulomas, for fibronodular changes was 10.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-33), for mass or pleural effusion it was 11.6 (95%CI 3.6-37), and for parenchymal infiltrate it was 46.1 (95%CI 18-117). Among tuberculin-positive close contacts, the probability of active tuberculosis was more than 50% if the radiographs showed any mass, pleural disease, or parenchymal infiltrates. CONCLUSION: A simple classification of TB-related chest radiographic abnormalities into five broad categories had moderate to substantial reproducibility of readings, with reasonable validity.
SETTING: Tertiary care referral centre specialising in respiratory diseases. OBJECTIVES: Chest radiography is a major screening and diagnostic tool for tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated the reproducibility of a radiographic classification system for screening for active TB of immigration applicants to Canada. We also evaluated the validity of this classification system for detection of prevalent active TB among the screened applicants, as well as tuberculin-positive close contacts and symptomatic patients. METHODS: Reproducibility was assessed by re-reading a randomly selected 10% sample of screening chest films. Validity was estimated from the final clinical and microbiologic diagnosis of patients undergoing detailed clinical evaluation. RESULTS: Inter-reader agreement using five broad categories was moderate (kappas of 0.44-0.56), while intra-reader agreement was substantial (kappas of 0.59-0.72). After adjustment for age and patient group, the adjusted odds of active tuberculosis, relative to normal or minor findings or granulomas, for fibronodular changes was 10.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-33), for mass or pleural effusion it was 11.6 (95%CI 3.6-37), and for parenchymal infiltrate it was 46.1 (95%CI 18-117). Among tuberculin-positive close contacts, the probability of active tuberculosis was more than 50% if the radiographs showed any mass, pleural disease, or parenchymal infiltrates. CONCLUSION: A simple classification of TB-related chest radiographic abnormalities into five broad categories had moderate to substantial reproducibility of readings, with reasonable validity.
Authors: Won Jai Jung; Young Mok Park; Joo Han Song; Kyung Soo Chung; Song Yee Kim; Eun Young Kim; Ji Ye Jung; Moo Suk Park; Young Sam Kim; Se Kyu Kim; Joon Chang; Sung Hoon Noh; Ji Yeong An; Young Ae Kang Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-02-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: C D Hamilton; J E Stout; P C Goodman; A Mosher; R Menzies; N W Schluger; A Khan; J L Johnson; A N Vernon Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Jason E Stout; Andrzej S Kosinski; Carol Dukes Hamilton; Philip C Goodman; Ann Mosher; Dick Menzies; Neil Schluger; Awal Khan; John L Johnson Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Shinsaku Sakurada; Nguyen T L Hang; Naoki Ishizuka; Emiko Toyota; Le D Hung; Pham T Chuc; Luu T Lien; Pham H Thuong; Pham T N Bich; Naoto Keicho; Nobuyuki Kobayashi Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Chang-Hoon Lee; Yun-Jeong Jeong; Eun Young Heo; Jong Sun Park; Ji Sun Lee; Byoung Jun Lee; Young Sik Park; Eun Hee Song; Yun Jung Yang; Young Soo Cho; En-hi Cho; Kyoung-in Na; Eun-Jeong Oh; Jin-beom Lee; Soo-Yeon Oh; HeeJin Kim; Chang Min Park; Jae-Joon Yim Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Marianne Breuninger; Bram van Ginneken; Rick H H M Philipsen; Francis Mhimbira; Jerry J Hella; Fred Lwilla; Jan van den Hombergh; Amanda Ross; Levan Jugheli; Dirk Wagner; Klaus Reither Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 3.240