Literature DB >> 11931232

Transvection in Drosophila.

James A Kennison1, Jeffrey W Southworth.   

Abstract

Pairing-dependent interallelic complementation was first described for the Ultrabithorax gene of the bithorax-complex in Drosophila by Lewis and cited as an example of a new phenomenon that Lewis called the "trans-vection effect." Several different kinds of pairing-dependent gene expression have been observed in Drosophila, and it is now clear that a variety of different molecular mechanisms probably underlie the changes in gene expression that are observed after disrupting chromosome pairing. Transvection in the bithorax-complex appears to result from the ability of cis-regulatory elements to regulate transcription of the promoter on the homologous chromosome. The same phenomenon appears to be responsible for pairing-dependent interallelic complementation at numerous other genes in Drosophila. Some transvection effects are dependent on the presence of wild-type or specific mutant forms of the protein encoded by the zeste trans-regulatory gene, but other transvection effects are zeste-independent. The ease with which chromosome aberrations can disrupt transvection also varies widely among different genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11931232     DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2660(02)46014-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Genet        ISSN: 0065-2660            Impact factor:   1.944


  38 in total

1.  Enhancer action in trans is permitted throughout the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Ji-Long Chen; Kathryn L Huisinga; Michaela M Viering; Sharon A Ou; C-ting Wu; Pamela K Geyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Enhancer choice in cis and in trans in Drosophila melanogaster: role of the promoter.

Authors:  James R Morris; Dmitri A Petrov; Anne M Lee; Chao-Ting Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Assessing the effect of the CLPG mutation on the microRNA catalog of skeletal muscle using high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Florian Caiment; Carole Charlier; Tracy Hadfield; Noelle Cockett; Michel Georges; Denis Baurain
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Comparing enhancer action in cis and in trans.

Authors:  Jack R Bateman; Justine E Johnson; Melissa N Locke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Sequence analysis and organization of the Neodiprion abietis nucleopolyhedrovirus genome.

Authors:  Simon P Duffy; Aaron M Young; Benoit Morin; Christopher J Lucarotti; Ben F Koop; David B Levin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Drosophila gypsy insulator and yellow enhancers regulate activity of yellow promoter through the same regulatory element.

Authors:  Larisa Melnikova; Margarita Kostuchenko; Margarita Silicheva; Pavel Georgiev
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  A genomewide survey argues that every zygotic gene product is dispensable for the initiation of somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jack R Bateman; C-ting Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Effects of chromosomal rearrangements on transvection at the yellow gene of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sharon A Ou; Elaine Chang; Szexian Lee; Katherine So; C-ting Wu; James R Morris
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Transvection in 2012: site-specific transgenes reveal a plethora of trans-regulatory effects.

Authors:  Judith A Kassis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  C. elegans RNA-dependent RNA polymerases rrf-1 and ego-1 silence Drosophila transgenes by differing mechanisms.

Authors:  Guowen Duan; Robert B Saint; Chris A Helliwell; Carolyn A Behm; Ming-Bo Wang; Peter M Waterhouse; Karl H J Gordon
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.