Literature DB >> 11929924

Comparison of human ocular torsion patterns during natural and galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Erich Schneider1, Stefan Glasauer, Marianne Dieterich.   

Abstract

Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is reported to induce interindividually variable tonic ocular torsion (OT) and superimposed torsional nystagmus. It has been proposed that the tonic component results from the activation of otolith afferents. We tested our hypothesis that both the tonic and the phasic OT are mainly due to semicircular canal (SCC) stimulation by examining whether the OT patterns elicited by GVS can be reproduced by pure SCC stimulations. Using videooculography we measured the OT of six healthy subjects while two different stimuli with a duration of 20 s were applied: 1) transmastoidal GVS steps of 2 mA with the head in a pitched nose-down position and 2) angular head rotations around a combined roll-yaw axis parallel to the gravity vector with the head in the same position. The stimulation profile was individually scaled to match the nystagmus properties from GVS and consisted of a sustained velocity step of 4-12 degrees /s on which a velocity ramp of 0.67-2 degrees /s(2) was superimposed. Since blinks were reported to induce transient torsional eye movements, the subjects were also asked to blink once 10 s after stimulus onset. Analysis of torsional eye movements under both conditions revealed no significant differences. Thus we conclude that both the tonic and the phasic OT responses to GVS can be reproduced by pure rotational stimulations and that the OT-related effects of GVS on SCC afferents are similar to natural stimulations at small amplitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11929924     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00558.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  33 in total

1.  Anodal vestibular stimulation does not suppress vestibular reflexes in human subjects.

Authors:  Ann M Bacsi; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Christopher J Dakin; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Richard C Fitzpatrick; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Do you know where your arm is if you think your head has moved?

Authors:  Joanna J Knox; Michel W Coppieters; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modeling postural instability with Galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Hamish G MacDougall; Steven T Moore; Ian S Curthoys; F Owen Black
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Gait deviations induced by visual stimulation in roll.

Authors:  Erich Schneider; Klaus Jahn; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt; Michael Strupp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Task-dependent vestibular feedback responses in reaching.

Authors:  Johannes Keyser; W Pieter Medendorp; Luc P J Selen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neuronal network-based mathematical modeling of perceived verticality in acute unilateral vestibular lesions: from nerve to thalamus and cortex.

Authors:  S Glasauer; M Dieterich; T Brandt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation: Cellular Substrates and Response Patterns of Neurons in the Vestibulo-Ocular Network.

Authors:  Kathrin D Gensberger; Anna-Kristin Kaufmann; Haike Dietrich; Francisco Branoner; Roberto Banchi; Boris P Chagnaud; Hans Straka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Virtual head rotation reveals a process of route reconstruction from human vestibular signals.

Authors:  Brian L Day; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Transmastoid galvanic stimulation does not affect the vergence-mediated gain increase of the human angular vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.