Literature DB >> 11929023

Communication and sampling rate limitations in IMRT delivery with a dynamic multileaf collimator system.

Ping Xia1, Cynthia F Chuang, Lynn J Verhey.   

Abstract

The delivery of an intensity modulated radiation field with a dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) requires precise correlation between MLC positions and cumulative monitor units (MUs). The purpose of this study is to investigate the precision of this correlation as a function of delivered MUs and dose rate. A semi-Gaussian shaped intensity profile and a simple geometric intensity pattern consisting of four square segments were designed to deliver a total of 1, 4, 16, 64, and 100 MUs at three different dose rates of 100, 400, and 600 MU/min. The semi-Gaussian intensity pattern was delivered using both sliding window and step and shoot techniques. The dose profiles of this intensity pattern were measured with films. The four square intensity pattern was delivered using step and shoot and conventional delivery techniques for comparison. Because of geometrical symmetry, the dose to each segment in this intensity pattern is expected to be the same when the same MU is assigned to each segment. An ionization chamber was used to measure the dose in the center of each of the four square segments. For the semi-Gaussian shaped profile, significant artifacts were observed when the profile was delivered with small MUs and/or at a high dose rate. For the four square intensity pattern, the dose measured in each segment presented a large variation when delivered with small MUs and a high dose rate. The variation increases as the MU/segment decreases and as the dose rate increases. These MU and dose rate dependencies were not observed when the intensity pattern was delivered using a conventional delivery technique. The observed distortion of the semi-Gaussian profile and dose variations among the segments of the four square intensity pattern are explained by considering the sampling rate and the communication time lag between the control systems. Finally, clinical significance is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11929023     DOI: 10.1118/1.1449496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  The use of EPID-measured leaf sequence files for IMRT dose reconstruction in adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Louis Lee; Weihua Mao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The Impact of Dose Rate on the Accuracy of Step-and-Shoot Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Using Varian 2300CD.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh; Howard W Salmon; Claire Schiller
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

3.  Impact of small MU/segment and dose rate on delivery accuracy of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Authors:  Long Huang; Tingliang Zhuang; Anthony Mastroianni; Toufik Djemil; Taoran Cui; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Evaluation of beam hardening and photon scatter by brass compensator for IMRT.

Authors:  Shimpei Hashimoto; Katsuyuki Karasawa; Yukio Fujita; Hisayuki Miyashita; Weishan Chang; Toru Kawachi; Tetsurou Katayose; Nao Kobayashi; Etsuo Kunieda; Hidetoshi Saitoh
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Compensators: an alternative IMRT delivery technique.

Authors:  Sha X Chang; Timothy J Cullip; Katharin M Deschesne; Elizabeth P Miller; Julian G Rosenman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Dosimetric characteristics of a cubic-block-piled compensator for intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the Pinnacle radiotherapy treatment planning system.

Authors:  Koji Sasaki; Yasunori Obata
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  The step-and-shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage.

Authors:  Heming Zhen; Luo Ouyang; Qinan Bao; Nan Qin; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Arnold Pompos
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.