Literature DB >> 11928097

Speech after partial glossectomy: a comparison between reconstruction and nonreconstruction patients.

Chen Chuanjun1, Zhang Zhiyuan, Gao Shaopu, Jiang Xinquan, Zhang Zhihong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare the articulation intelligibility of patients after hemiglossectomy or minor glossectomy within the hemitongue with or without reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The articulation intelligibility of 19 patients who underwent hemiglossetomy or minor glossectomy within the hemitongue was investigated at least 6 months after surgery with an articulation intelligibility test with 40 sensitive Chinese sounds. Patients were divided into group 1 (those undergoing reconstructive surgery after glossectomy) and group 2 (those not undergoing reconstructive surgery after glossectomy). Defects of the tongue (in group 1) were reconstructed immediately with free radial forearm flaps or pedicled flaps after glossectomy and closed primarily without reconstruction in group 2. The articulation intelligibility scores were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The mean articulation intelligibility score for group 1 was 77.0% (blade portion glossal sounds), 76.3% (mid portion glossal sounds), and 84.7% (rear portion glossal sounds), and those of group 2 were 94.6%, 92.1%, and 95.3%, respectively. The intelligibility of articulation of group 2 was significantly higher than that of group 1 in blade portion glossal sounds (P <.05), mid portion glossal sounds (P <.05), and rear portion glossal sounds (P <.01).
CONCLUSION: The articulation intelligibility was better in patients not receiving grafts than in those receiving grafts. Reconstruction with flaps, which may interfere with the flexibility and mobility of the tongue, may contribute to articulatory impairment. If speech is the outcome of interest, reconstruction may be unnecessary with hemiglossectomy or other partial (minor) glossectomy within the hemitongue. Copyright 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11928097     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.31228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  10 in total

1.  Frequency of Apical and Laminal /s/ in Normal and Postglossectomy Patients.

Authors:  Maureen Stone; Susan Rizk; Jonghye Woo; Emi Z Murano; Hegang Chen; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  J Med Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-12

2.  Development and first data of a customized short tracheal cannula based on digital data.

Authors:  Rainer Müller; Heike Meißner; Gunter Böttcher; Lutz Jatzwauk; Ludwig Kant; Matthias C Schulz; Bernd Reitemeier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Subject-Specific Biomechanical Modelling of the Oropharynx: Towards Speech Production.

Authors: 
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis       Date:  2015-05-05

Review 4.  Rehabilitation of Glossectomy Cases with Tongue Prosthesis: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Muthu Kumar Balasubramaniam; Ahila Singaravel Chidambaranathan; Gokul Shanmugam; Rajdeep Tah
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

5.  Long-term functional outcomes after resection of tongue cancer: determining the optimal reconstruction method.

Authors:  Yong Bae Ji; Yong Hee Cho; Chang Myeon Song; Youn Hwan Kim; Jeong Tae Kim; Hee Chang Ahn; Kyung Tae
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  An evaluation of the University of Washington Quality of Life swallowing domain following oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  L Thomas; T M Jones; S Tandon; C Katre; D Lowe; S N Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Validation of an Intelligibility Assessment Tool in an Indian Language for Perceptual Speech Analysis in Oral Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yogesh Dokhe; Krishnakumar Thankappan; Ridhi Sood; Arya Chandrababu Jaya; Deepak Balasubramanian; Shilpa Chatni; Bibitha Kizhakkevalappil Babu; Sajith Babu; Swapna Sebastian; Shaji Thomas; Paul Sebastian; Subramania Iyer
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-19

8.  Analysis of speech and tongue motion in normal and post-glossectomy speaker using cine MRI.

Authors:  Jinhee Ha; Iel-Yong Sung; Jang-Ho Son; Maureen Stone; Robert Ord; Yeong-Cheol Cho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 9.  Post-glossectomy in lingual carcinomas: a scope for sign language in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Arvind Babu Rajendra Santosh; Keren Cumberbatch; Thaon Jones
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2017-06-30

10.  Case Report: Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap for Tongue Reconstruction Following the Hemiglossectomy.

Authors:  Yihong Fang; Qiming Ouyang; Zhi Zheng; Jin Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-11-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.