| Literature DB >> 34805255 |
Yihong Fang1, Qiming Ouyang1, Zhi Zheng1, Jin Wang1.
Abstract
Objective: Therapeutic evaluation of applying superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap in tongue reconstruction after hemiglossectomy.Entities:
Keywords: hemiglossectomy; oral maxillofacial reconstruction; superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap; tongue cancer; tongue reconstruction
Year: 2021 PMID: 34805255 PMCID: PMC8599122 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.692331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Patient characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 25 | 21.5 | 73 | SCC | T2N1M0 | 18 | Absence |
| 2 | Female | 32 | 21.7 | 74.2 | SCC | T2N0M0 | 12 | Absence |
| 3 | Male | 38 | 24.6 | 81.5 | SCC | T2N1M0 | 12 | Absence |
| 4 | Male | 41 | 23.8 | 79.2 | SCC | T2N1M0 | 15 | Absence |
| 5 | Female | 43 | 26.3 | 86.2 | SCC | T2N1M0 | 9 | Absence |
| 6 | Male | 47 | 24.2 | 82.4 | SCC | T2N1M0 | 6 | Absence |
| 7 | Female | 48 | 23.4 | 78.6 | SCC | T2N0M0 | 18 | Absence |
| 8 | Female | 55 | 26.2 | 85.9 | SCC | T2N2M0 | 9 | Absence |
| 9 | Male | 56 | 27.1 | 88.3 | SCC | T2N0M0 | 9 | Absence |
| 10 | Female | 60 | 29.1 | 92.8 | SCC | T2N1M0 | 6 | Absence |
| 11 | Female | 37 | 22.5 | 76.6 | SCC | T2N0M0 | 12 | Absence |
| 12 | Male | 65 | 21.8 | 74 | SCC | T2N1M0 | 12 | Absence |
| 13 | Male | 51 | 23.9 | 80.2 | SCC | T2N1M0 | 9 | Absence |
| 14 | Female | 42 | 25.7 | 84.2 | SCC | T2N0M0 | 6 | Absence |
SCC, Squamous cell carcinoma.
Detailed information of characteristics of SCIP flaps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 * 8 | 0.7 | 8 | 8 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| 2 | 6 * 8 | 0.8 | 7.5 | 8 | 0.7 | 1 |
| 3 | 7 * 8 | 1.1 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 0.9 | 1.4 |
| 4 | 6 * 7.5 | 0.9 | 7.2 | 7.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 5 | 7.5 * 9 | 1.3 | 9 | 9 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| 6 | 7 * 8 | 1 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| 7 | 6.5 * 7 | 0.9 | 7 | 7.2 | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| 8 | 6.5 * 7 | 1.3 | 8.3 | 8.5 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| 9 | 6 * 7.5 | 1.4 | 8.4 | 8.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| 10 | 6.5 * 9 | 1.5 | 8.6 | 9.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 11 | 7 * 7 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 12 | 6.5 * 8 | 0.8 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| 13 | 6.5 * 7.5 | 1.1 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| 14 | 7 * 8 | 1.2 | 7.7 | 8.2 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
Functional evaluation of SCIP flap reconstruction after 6-month follow-up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Good | Stage I | Normal | Regular |
| 2 | Good | Stage I | Normal | Regular |
| 3 | Good | Stage I | Normal | Soft |
| 4 | Good | Stage I | Slightly impaired | Soft |
| 5 | Good | Stage I | Normal | Regular |
| 6 | Good | Stage I | Normal | Soft |
| 7 | Good | Stage I | Slightly impaired | Soft |
| 8 | Good | Stage I | Slightly impaired | Soft |
| 9 | Good | Stage I | Slightly impaired | Soft |
| 10 | Good | Stage I | Slightly impaired | Soft |
| 11 | Good | Stage I | Normal | Soft |
| 12 | Good | Stage I | Normal | Soft |
| 13 | Good | Stage I | Slightly impaired | Soft |
| 14 | Good | Stage I | Slightly impaired | Soft |
Figure 1SCIP flap preparation and reconstruction process.