Literature DB >> 11927464

The normal difference in bilateral indirect blood pressure recordings in hypertensive individuals.

Gene R Pesola1, Helen R Pesola, Ming Lin, Michael J Nelson, Richard E Westfal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: If there is a significant dichotomy between bilateral systolic blood pressure determinations in both arms in hypertensive individuals, it is often taken as a sign of underlying pathology. The primary objective was to determine what the normal variation might be for a significant difference between blood pressures in both arms. A clinically significant difference was chosen as a systolic blood pressure value greater than 10 mm Hg between the upper extremities, as is commonly quoted at the bedside and in the literature.
METHODS: Bilateral indirect blood pressure determinations were obtained in 100 subjects with hypertension in the sitting position. The blood pressure was obtained by two observers, one the recorder and the other who obtained the blood pressure but was blinded to the actual values taken. The order of blood pressure determination in the first arm was determined prior to the study from a table of random numbers. The coefficient of variation in obtaining the blood pressure in each arm was determined in 5 of the 100 subjects. The age, sex, and handedness of each individual were recorded as demographic variables.
RESULTS: The average left and right systolic blood pressures were 139 +/- 22 and 141 +/- 22 mm Hg, respectively. The average left and right diastolic blood pressures were 78 +/- 12 and 79 +/- 13 mm Hg, respectively. There was no significant difference between left minus right systolic or diastolic differences (paired t-test). There was no significant difference between systolic or diastolic blood pressures between gender or between left- and right-handed individuals (nonpaired t-test). The average coefficients of variation for taking right and left arm systolic pressures were 2.90% and 1.32%, respectively. Eighteen subjects (18%) had differences in systolic blood pressure between both arms exceeding 10 mm Hg (10% to 26%, 95% confidence interval).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences of more than 10 mm Hg in indirect systolic blood pressure recordings between arms are frequent in asymptomatic hypertensive individuals and do not per se indicate any pathologic condition. In the right clinical situation, differences that are noted should be repeated and should be added to the total clinical picture when used to determine whether a pathologic condition is present. Assuming no significant aortic or subclavian disease in the population tested, the specificity of the bilateral blood pressure test was 82%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11927464     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01333.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

1.  Considerations for SphygmoCor radial artery pulse wave analysis: side selection and peripheral arterial blood pressure calibration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Martin; Alexandra R Borges; John B Christy; Darren T Beck
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  The systolic blood pressure difference between arms and cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ido Weinberg; Philimon Gona; Christopher J O'Donnell; Michael R Jaff; Joanne M Murabito
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Inter-arm blood pressure difference and mortality: a cohort study in an asymptomatic primary care population at elevated cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Rod S Taylor; Isabella Butcher; Marlene Cw Stewart; Jackie Price; F Gerald R Fowkes; Angela C Shore; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The difference in blood pressure readings between arms and survival: primary care cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Rod S Taylor; Angela C Shore; John L Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-03-20

5.  Association of Inter-arm Blood Pressure Difference with Asymptomatic Intracranial and Extracranial Arterial Stenosis in Hypertension Patients.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Jin Zhang; Yuesheng Qian; Xiaofeng Tang; Huawei Ling; Kemin Chen; Yan Li; Pingjin Gao; Dingliang Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.