Literature DB >> 11927296

Changing indications of open stone surgery.

Brian R Matlaga1, Dean G Assimos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the current role of open stone surgery at our institution to previously reported data. In 1989, the indications for open surgical treatment of urinary calculi at our institution were reviewed. In the intervening years, tremendous advances have been made in minimally invasive treatment of urinary calculi.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing procedures for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001 was conducted. This was compared with data reported from our institution describing similar procedures in the first 19 months after introduction of the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor.
RESULTS: Of 986 procedures performed for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001, 0.7% were open surgical procedures. Of these procedures, 85.8% were performed for anatomic indications. Patients referred from other institutions for evaluation after endoscopic treatment failure comprised the remaining 14.2% of this group. In the previously reported data, 893 procedures were performed for the treatment of urinary calculi, of which 4.1% were open operations. Of these patients, 48.6% underwent an open surgical procedure after unsuccessful endoscopic treatment of urinary calculi, and 48.7% of these patients underwent open surgery for anatomic indications.
CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical stone removal remains a viable treatment option for select patients. Technologic advances and improved surgical skills have greatly reduced the number of patients requiring open surgery. This approach is mainly used for patients with complex calculous disease associated with anatomic abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11927296     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01670-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  30 in total

1.  Impact of stone removal on renal function: a review.

Authors:  Kyle Wood; Tristan Keys; Patrick Mufarrij; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

2.  The (soon forgotten) art of open stone surgery: to train or not to train?

Authors:  Noor N P Buchholz; Andrew Hitchings; Stephanos Albanis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Panlithiasis of the urinary tract: a case for open lithotomy in the modern era.

Authors:  Panagiotis Christopoulos; Goran Fryad; Andreas Bourdoumis; Georgios Papadopoulos; Stefanos Kachrilas; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative complications based on ASA risks in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Hüseyin Buğra Karakaş; İzzet Çiçekbilek; Adem Tok; Tamer Alışkan; Bülent Akduman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

5.  The stone surgeon in the mirror: how are German-speaking urologists treating large renal stones today?

Authors:  Martin Schoenthaler; Simon Hein; Christian Seitz; Christian Türk; Hansjörg Danuser; Werner Vach; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Efficacy of surgical techniques and factors affecting residual stone rate in the treatment of kidney stones.

Authors:  Hüseyin Aydemir; Salih Budak; Şükrü Kumsar; Osman Köse; Hasan Salih Sağlam; Öztuğ Adsan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-09

7.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stones greater than 2 cm.

Authors:  Orhan Karakoç; Ahmet Karakeçi; Tunç Ozan; Fatih Fırdolaş; Cihat Tektaş; Şehmus Erdem Özkarataş; İrfan Orhan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

8.  A comparison of balloon and amplatz dilators in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective evaluation.

Authors:  Burak Özçift; Kaan Bal; Çetin Dinçel
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-12

9.  Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  Ramazan Altıntaş; Ali Beytur; Fatih Oğuz; Serhan Çimen; Ender Akdemir; Ali Güneş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-06

10.  A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Maneesh Sinha; K R John; K N Chacko; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.