Literature DB >> 11927116

Could American women use mifepristone-misoprostol pills safely with less medical supervision?

Cynthia Harper1, Charlotte Ellertson, Beverly Winikoff.   

Abstract

Medical methods of early abortion differ from surgical methods in that women themselves can potentially administer the regimens. As currently researched and offered, however, the main regimen used for medical abortion, mifepristone-misoprostol, is highly medicalized, involving several clinic visits and extensive physician involvement. We re-examined the role of clinical supervision in each step of the abortion process, using data collected during a large clinical trial of mifepristone-misoprostol abortions in the US, fielded during 1994-1995. The trial was carried out in 17 geographically diverse centers, including private, public, and nongovernmental organization clinics, and enrolled 2121 women, aged 18-45 years, seeking early abortion (< or =63 days since last menstrual period). Women received 600 mg oral mifepristone, followed 48 h later by 400 microg oral misoprostol. Evidence suggests that most women can handle most steps of the medical abortion process themselves, effectively and safely. The utility of clinic visits to ingest mifepristone and misoprostol is questionable. For many women, even the follow-up visit could perhaps be replaced by telephone follow-up, combined with home pregnancy tests. Alternatives to the present protocol might allow greater control, comfort, and convenience at lower cost. Where clinician involvement might be useful, mid-level health care providers typically possess the skills necessary to offer the method safely, implying that physicians might be necessary only as complications arise. Future research useful for determining the optimal amount of medical involvement to provide mifepristone-misoprostol safely and effectively should include self-screening tests, label comprehension tests, calendars to aid in calculating gestational age, and the development of special pregnancy tests with telephone follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11927116     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00300-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  9 in total

1.  Barriers to contraceptive use in product labeling and practice guidelines.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Charlotte Ellertson; Katrina Abuabara; Kelly Blanchard; Francisco T Rivas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Remote Delivery in Reproductive Health Care: Operation of Direct-to-Patient Telehealth Medication Abortion Services in Diverse Settings.

Authors:  Anna E Fiastro; Sajal Sanan; Elizabeth Jacob-Files; Elisa Wells; Francine Coeytaux; Molly R Ruben; Ian M Bennett; Emily M Godfrey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.707

Review 3.  Voluntary termination of pregnancy (medical or surgical abortion): forensic medicine issues.

Authors:  Mauro Piras; Paola Delbon; Paola Bin; Claudia Casella; Emanuele Capasso; Massimo Niola; Adelaide Conti
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-08-13

Review 4.  A research agenda for moving early medical pregnancy termination over the counter.

Authors:  N Kapp; D Grossman; E Jackson; L Castleman; D Brahmi
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Commentary: No-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Raymond; Daniel Grossman; Alice Mark; Ushma D Upadhyay; Gillian Dean; Mitchell D Creinin; Leah Coplon; Jamila Perritt; Jessica M Atrio; DeShawn Taylor; Marji Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Provision of medication abortion in Hawai'i during COVID-19: Practical experience with multiple care delivery models.

Authors:  Courtney Kerestes; Sarah Murayama; Jasmine Tyson; Melissa Natavio; Elisabeth Seamon; Shandhini Raidoo; Lea Lacar; Emory Bowen; Reni Soon; Ingrida Platais; Bliss Kaneshiro; Paris Stowers
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mary Tschann; Elizabeth S Ly; Sara Hilliard; Hannah L H Lange
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Self-testing for pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caitlin E Kennedy; Ping Teresa Yeh; Karima Gholbzouri; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Early termination of pregnancy: differences in gestational age estimation using last menstrual period and ultrasound in Mexico.

Authors:  Biani Saavedra-Avendano; Raffaela Schiavon; Patricio Sanhueza; Ranulfo Rios-Polanco; Laura Garcia-Martinez; Blair G Darney
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.