Literature DB >> 11926259

Understanding return to work behaviours: promoting the importance of individual perceptions in the study of return to work.

Lynn Shaw1, Ruth Segal, Helen Polatajko, Karen Harburn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate and discuss how individuals' subjective perceptions of personal and environmental issues influence return to work behaviour.
METHOD: A qualitative design utilizing in-depth interviews and maximum variation sampling of 11 individuals who either returned to work or withdrew from work after a health leave was conducted. Experiences elicited were analysed using the constant comparative method followed by a member check with participants to confirm findings and interpretations.
RESULTS: Findings underscored the importance of two key constructs in understanding return to work from the individual's perspective: the personal meaning of disability and return to work relevancy. Throughout the experience of getting better and returning to work participants reflected upon the impact of personal and external factors that contributed to their work disability, sought clarity of their performance capacities and examined the importance of work and the consequences of work disability within their life circumstances.
CONCLUSIONS: Insights into an individual's perceptions of their impairment and the personal relevance of work can promote a better understanding of return to work behaviour. Integrating individual perceptions is essential to advancing a multidimensional approach in return to work research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11926259     DOI: 10.1080/09638280110066299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  13 in total

1.  Focus on motivation in the work rehabilitation planning process: a qualitative study from the employer's perspective.

Authors:  Gunvor Gard; Agneta Larsson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-09

2.  Rehabilitation of injured workers with chronic pain: a stage of change phenomenon.

Authors:  Yan-Wen Xu; Chetwyn C H Chan; Chow S Lam; Cecilia W P Li-Tsang; Karen Y L Lo-Hui; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-23

Review 3.  Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome.

Authors:  Joanna Fadyl; Kathryn McPherson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-10-29

Review 4.  Representations: an important key to understanding workers' coping behaviors during rehabilitation and the return-to-work process.

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Raymond Baril; Marie-José Durand; Daniel Côté; Annick Rouleau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-13

5.  What affects return to work for graduates of a pain management program with chronic upper limb pain?

Authors:  Jacqueline H Adams; Amanda C de C Williams
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-06

6.  Gender differences in psychosocial influence and rehabilitation outcomes for work-disabled individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Monica Lillefjell
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

7.  What concerns workers with low back pain? Findings of a qualitative study of patients referred for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Carol Coole; Avril Drummond; Paul J Watson; Kathryn Radford
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-12

Review 8.  What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review.

Authors:  S L Saunders; B Nedelec
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03

9.  Importance of participation in major life areas matters for return to work.

Authors:  Lisbeth Kvam; Kjersti Vik; Arne Henning Eide
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

10.  eHealth program to empower patients in returning to normal activities and work after gynecological surgery: intervention mapping as a useful method for development.

Authors:  Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Judith A F Huirne; Carina A Pittens; Willem van Mechelen; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Hans A M Brölmann; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.