OBJECTIVE: Attitude, together with knowledge, is important in determining behaviour. Doctors' attitudes affect the recognition and management of mental health. We detail the development of an instrument to measure general practitioner attitudes to the recognition and management of depression and anxiety disorders. METHOD: A literature review and semistructured interviews with GPs identified constructs for inclusion into the questionnaire. Items were written and examined by a panel of psychiatrists, GPs and statisticians to establish face and content validity. The resulting 30 item questionnaire was given to a convenience sample of 63 GPs in Australia with an interest in mental health, and their responses analysed using exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: Exploration of the data identified two factors. Factor 1 contained 12 items measuring professional comfort and competence with the care of mental health disorders (alpha = 0.82). Factor 2 contained five items that assessed GP concerns about difficulties with the health care system in this area (alpha = 0.73). DISCUSSION: The factor analysis shows that GPs' attitudes can be parsimoniously described by two factors, instead of the five that the literature suggests. The high values of Cronbach's alpha demonstrate that these two factors can be measured reliably. These were not the anticipated results, and can be taken to indicate that GPs' attitudes to their roles in the recognition and management of patients with depression and anxiety disorders are less complex than might otherwise be imagined.
OBJECTIVE: Attitude, together with knowledge, is important in determining behaviour. Doctors' attitudes affect the recognition and management of mental health. We detail the development of an instrument to measure general practitioner attitudes to the recognition and management of depression and anxiety disorders. METHOD: A literature review and semistructured interviews with GPs identified constructs for inclusion into the questionnaire. Items were written and examined by a panel of psychiatrists, GPs and statisticians to establish face and content validity. The resulting 30 item questionnaire was given to a convenience sample of 63 GPs in Australia with an interest in mental health, and their responses analysed using exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: Exploration of the data identified two factors. Factor 1 contained 12 items measuring professional comfort and competence with the care of mental health disorders (alpha = 0.82). Factor 2 contained five items that assessed GP concerns about difficulties with the health care system in this area (alpha = 0.73). DISCUSSION: The factor analysis shows that GPs' attitudes can be parsimoniously described by two factors, instead of the five that the literature suggests. The high values of Cronbach's alpha demonstrate that these two factors can be measured reliably. These were not the anticipated results, and can be taken to indicate that GPs' attitudes to their roles in the recognition and management of patients with depression and anxiety disorders are less complex than might otherwise be imagined.
Authors: Amary Mey; Jane L Fowler; Kathy Knox; David H K Shum; Jasmina Fejzic; Laetitia Hattingh; Denise McConnell; Amanda Wheeler Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2013-01-10
Authors: Joanna L Norton; Christelle Pommié; Joël Cogneau; Mark Haddad; Karen A Ritchie; Anthony H Mann Journal: Int J Psychiatry Med Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.210
Authors: Monica Cepoiu; Jane McCusker; Martin G Cole; Maida Sewitch; Eric Belzile; Antonio Ciampi Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: C Sighinolfi; A Norcini Pala; F Casini; M Haddad; D Berardi; M Menchetti Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 6.892