Literature DB >> 11925136

Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection: a comparative study.

Denis Querleu1, Fabrice Narducci, Valery Poulard, Sophie Lacaze, Bruno Occelli, Eric Leblanc, Michel Cosson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nerve-sparing dissection of the lateral portion of the cardinal ligament (paracervical lymphadenectomy) has been recently developed with the goal of reducing the late urinary adverse effects of radical hysterectomy without impairing the outcome. This work has been carried out in order to investigate the influence of additional paracervical lymph node dissection at the time of laparoscopically assisted modified radical hysterectomy on outcome and urinary sequelae.
METHODS: A total of 95 patients underwent a modified radical hysterectomy using a combined laparoscopic and vaginal approach since 1991. In 47 of these patients treated since 1996 an additional laparoscopic paracervical lymphadenectomy was performed. The operative, postoperative, and survival outcomes were assessed. In 60 patients, 32 and 28 in the groups of patients with or without paracervical dissection, respectively, a careful interview on urinary symptoms was conducted by an independent investigator.
RESULTS: Paracervical dissection involves no operative complication and lenghthens the postoperative urinary retention, but has no adverse influence on long-term urinary discomfort. The yield of paracervical dissection is negligible for small tumors: no positive node was found in 38 patients with tumors less than 2 cm in diameter. The outcome of patients after minimal access surgery for tumors less than 2 cm is excellent whether or not a paracervical dissection has been performed.
CONCLUSION: Paracervical dissection does not worsen the late urinary symptoms after vaginal radical hysterectomy. It has a limited value in the surgical management of small-size (less than 2 cm) cervical cancers, although it may prevent long-term lateropelvic recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11925136     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

2.  Prevalence and outcome of urinary retention after laparoscopic surgery for severe endometriosis--does histology provide answers?

Authors:  Boris Gabriel; Joseph Nassif; Pantelis Trompoukis; Ana Maria Lima; Sonia Barata; Gerlinde Lang-Avérous; Arnaud Wattiez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Comparison of a novel surgical approach for radical hysterectomy: robotic assistance versus open surgery.

Authors:  Gerald Feuer; Benedict Benigno; Lindal Krige; Patricia Alvarez
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-10-09

4.  2017 Update on the Querleu-Morrow Classification of Radical Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Denis Querleu; David Cibula; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Radical Hysterectomy After the LACC Trial: Back to Radical Vaginal Surgery.

Authors:  Denis Querleu; Delphine Hudry; Fabrice Narducci; Agnieszka Rychlik
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-02-23

7.  Laparoscopic identification of pelvic nerves in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis.

Authors:  E Volpi; A Ferrero; P Sismondi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Separate lateral parametrial lymph node dissection improves detection rate of parametrial lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer: 10-year clinical evaluation in a single center in China.

Authors:  Dan Zhao; Bin Li; Shan Zheng; Zhengjie Ou; Yanan Zhang; Yating Wang; Shuanghuan Liu; Gongyi Zhang; Guangwen Yuan
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: rationale, technique, results.

Authors:  Elisabeth Gottschalk; Malgorzata Lanowska; Vito Chiantera; Simone Marnitz; Achim Schneider; Verena Brink-Spalink; Kati Hasenbein; Christhardt Koehler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hee Seung Kim; Keewon Kim; Seung Bum Ryoo; Joung Hwa Seo; Sang Youn Kim; Ji Won Park; Min A Kim; Kyoung Sup Hong; Chang Wook Jeong; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.