Literature DB >> 11923776

Fluorescein electronic endoscopy: a novel method for detection of early stage gastric cancer not evident to routine endoscopy.

Ekapot Bhunchet1, Hiroya Hatakawa, Yoshinori Sakai, Toshikatsu Shibata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fluorescence endoscopy with fluorescein sodium in the stomach was evaluated by using a newly developed fluorescence electronic endoscopic system.
METHODS: Sixteen patients with early stage gastric cancer diagnosed by white light endoscopy and chromoendoscopy underwent fluorescein electronic endoscopy before surgery. The resection specimens underwent thorough histopathologic evaluation.
RESULTS: About 10 seconds after intravenous injection of fluorescein, fluorescence appeared and immediately spread throughout the gastric surface. A few minutes later, differentiated early stage gastric cancers with more abundant stroma than surrounding normal mucosa exhibited significantly stronger fluorescence, and those with less stroma exhibited weaker fluorescence than the surrounding normal mucosa. Undifferentiated early stage gastric cancers, in which the stroma became wider because foveolae were collapsed from malignant invasion, expressed stronger fluorescence intensity. In all cases, the borders of early stage gastric cancers were clearly demonstrated. Among the 16 patients, 6 accompanying flat lesions and 1 tiny lesion not evident by routine endoscopy were detected. The extent of the cancers, as determined by fluorescence endoscopy, were similar to those determined histopathologically.
CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescein electronic endoscopy is useful in determining the extent within the mucosa of gastric cancers when this is obscure by standard endoscopic observation, and for detecting extremely early stage cancer that is not evident by conventional endoscopic observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923776     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.122031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of autofluorescence imaging endoscopic findings with pathologic findings after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms.

Authors:  Wan Jung Kim; Joo Young Cho; Soung Won Jeong; Kyoung Min Kim; Ik Sung Choi; Jeung Ho Ham; Bo Young Lee; Jin Oh Kim; Joon Seong Lee; So Young Jin
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

2.  Usefulness of autofluorescence imaging for estimating the extent of gastric neoplastic lesions: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Jun Haeng Lee; Joo Yong Cho; Myung Gyu Choi; Joo Sung Kim; Kee Don Choi; Yong Chan Lee; Jae Young Jang; Hoon Jai Chun; Sang Yong Seol
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

3.  Surveillance using trimodal imaging endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasia.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Imaeda; Naoki Hosoe; Kazuhiro Kashiwagi; Yosuke Ida; Rieko Nakamura; Hidekazu Suzuki; Yoshimasa Saito; Naohisa Yahagi; Yasushi Iwao; Yuko Kitagawa; Toshifumi Hibi; Haruhiko Ogata; Takanori Kanai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Optical imaging of apoptosis as a biomarker of tumor response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Eyk A Schellenberger; Alexei Bogdanov; Alexander Petrovsky; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Ralph Weissleder; Lee Josephson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  The clinical accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and white light imaging in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Soon Hong Park; Sang Hun Sung; Seung Jun Lee; Min Kyu Jung; Sung Kook Kim; Seong Woo Jeon
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.720

6.  Advances in gas chromatographic methods for the identification of biomarkers in cancer.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Kouremenos; Mikael Johansson; Philip J Marriott
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 4.207

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.