BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine whether the margin of early to be detected gastric cancer (EGC) and gastric adenoma is easier to be detected with autofluorescence imaging (AFI) than with white-light endoscopy (WLE). METHODS: A total of 102 lesions (48 EGCs and 54 gastric adenomas) found in 98 patients were removed endoscopically or surgically. The measured length of each pathology specimen was compared with the lengths estimated using WLE, AFI, and chromoendoscopy. RESULTS: The lesions could be discriminated from surrounding mucosa by AFI in 86 cases (84.3%). The detection rates were similar for elevated lesions (85.1%) and flat/depressed lesions (82.9%, p=0.770). In terms of histology, the detection rate was slightly higher for adenomas (90.7%) than for cancer (77.1%, p=0.058). The estimated length was shorter than the pathologic length in 31.4% of cases when using WLE and 22.1% of cases when using AFI (p=0.168). The resection range was larger for EMR than for AFI in 24 of 80 cases (30.0%). CONCLUSIONS: WLE tends to underestimate the size of EGCs, whereas AFI tends to overestimate their size.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine whether the margin of early to be detected gastric cancer (EGC) and gastric adenoma is easier to be detected with autofluorescence imaging (AFI) than with white-light endoscopy (WLE). METHODS: A total of 102 lesions (48 EGCs and 54 gastric adenomas) found in 98 patients were removed endoscopically or surgically. The measured length of each pathology specimen was compared with the lengths estimated using WLE, AFI, and chromoendoscopy. RESULTS: The lesions could be discriminated from surrounding mucosa by AFI in 86 cases (84.3%). The detection rates were similar for elevated lesions (85.1%) and flat/depressed lesions (82.9%, p=0.770). In terms of histology, the detection rate was slightly higher for adenomas (90.7%) than for cancer (77.1%, p=0.058). The estimated length was shorter than the pathologic length in 31.4% of cases when using WLE and 22.1% of cases when using AFI (p=0.168). The resection range was larger for EMR than for AFI in 24 of 80 cases (30.0%). CONCLUSIONS: WLE tends to underestimate the size of EGCs, whereas AFI tends to overestimate their size.
Authors: J Haringsma; G N Tytgat; H Yano; H Iishi; M Tatsuta; T Ogihara; H Watanabe; N Sato; N Marcon; B C Wilson; R W Cline Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Jong Chan Youn; Young Hoon Youn; Tae Il Kim; Seung Woo Park; Se Joon Lee; Si Young Song; Jae Bock Chung; Youn Chan Lee; J C Youn; Y H Youn Journal: Hepatogastroenterology Date: 2006 Jul-Aug
Authors: Mohammed A Kara; Femke P Peters; Paul Fockens; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Jacques J G H M Bergman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Jae Pil Han; Su Jin Hong; Hee Kyung Kim; Yun Nah Lee; Tae Hee Lee; Bong Min Ko; Joo Young Cho Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 4.584