Literature DB >> 11922123

A planar and a volumetric test for stereoanomaly.

Raymond van Ee1, Whitman Richards.   

Abstract

Stereoanomaly is the failure to see differences in depth when the viewer is presented with stimuli having different magnitudes of stereoscopic disparity. In the absence of eye movements, everyone suffers from stereoanomaly for extremely large disparities. Typically, such disparities are seen at the same depth as monocular stimuli. However, about 30%, of the population exhibit some form of stereoanomaly even for very small disparities, provided eye movements are avoided. In some cases, the sign of the disparity will be confused, and the perceived depth will be incorrectly seen as 'behind' rather than 'in front of' the fixation point, for example. Because anomalies provide useful information about perceptual mechanisms, tests that measure and quantify the extent of a blindness are important investigative tools for research. Here we offer two easy-to-administer tests for stereoanomaly. The first test is based on depth judgments of two bars relative to a fixation point. The second test involves judgments of volumetric stimuli, seen stereoscopically. In each case, subjects indicate depth by setting a rectangle (with fixed base) to match the perceived depth. Although both tests are correlated, some differences in stereo processing are seen, depending upon whether or not the stimuli are presented near the point of fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11922123     DOI: 10.1068/p3303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces.

Authors:  Raymond van Ee; Gunta Krumina; Sylvia Pont; Sanne van der Ven
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Colour helps to solve the binocular matching problem.

Authors:  H E M den Ouden; R van Ee; E H F de Haan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

4.  Improved depth perception with three-dimensional auxiliary display and computer generated three-dimensional panoramic overviews in robot-assisted laparoscopy.

Authors:  Fokko P Wieringa; Henri Bouma; Pieter T Eendebak; Jean-Paul A van Basten; Harrie P Beerlage; Geert A H J Smits; Jelte E Bos
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-05-16

5.  Multivoxel pattern selectivity for perceptually relevant binocular disparities in the human brain.

Authors:  Tim J Preston; Sheng Li; Zoe Kourtzi; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  50 Years of Stereoblindness: Reconciliation of a Continuum of Disparity Detectors With Blindness for Disparity in Near or Far Depth.

Authors:  Reinder Dorman; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-16

7.  Contextual effects on binocular matching are evident in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Reuben Rideaux; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The experience of stereoblindness does not improve use of texture for slant perception.

Authors:  Pin Yang; Jeffrey A Saunders; Zhongting Chen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.004

9.  Perceptual incongruence influences bistability and cortical activation.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; Frank Tong; Peter Hagoort; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.