Literature DB >> 11921316

On being NICE in the UK: guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales.

Stephen Birch1, Amiram Gafni.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11921316     DOI: 10.1002/hec.706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  NICE methodological guidelines and decision making in the National Health Service in England and Wales.

Authors:  Amiram Gafni; Stephen Birch
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The 'NICE' approach to technology assessment: an economics perspective.

Authors:  Stephen Birch; Amiram Gafni
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-02

3.  The NICE reference case requirement: more pain for what, if any, gain?

Authors:  Amiram Gafni; Stephen Birch
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in protease inhibitor-experienced, HIV-1-infected adults in Belgium, Italy, Sweden and the UK.

Authors:  Karen Moeremans; Lieven Annemans; Mickael Löthgren; Gabriele Allegri; Veronique Wyffels; Lindsay Hemmet; Karin Caekelbergh; Erik Smets
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Estimation, power and sample size calculations for stochastic cost and effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  S D Walter; Amiram Gafni; Stephen Birch
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means.

Authors:  Christopher McCabe; Karl Claxton; Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Is there an economic rationale for cancer drugs to have a separate reimbursement review process for resource allocation purposes?

Authors:  Heather McDonald; Cathy Charles; Laurie Elit; Amiram Gafni
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  In a survey, marked inconsistency in how oncologists judged value of high-cost cancer drugs in relation to gains in survival.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Scott R Berry; Eric Nadler; Chaim M Bell; Michael A Kozminski; Jennifer A Palmer; William K Evans; Elizabeth L Strevel; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 9.  The role of patient preferences in cost-effectiveness analysis: a conflict of values?

Authors:  John E Brazier; Simon Dixon; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Trends in parameterization, economics and host behaviour in influenza pandemic modelling: a review and reporting protocol.

Authors:  Luis R Carrasco; Mark Jit; Mark I Chen; Vernon J Lee; George J Milne; Alex R Cook
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.