Literature DB >> 11919235

Impact of referral patterns on the use of chemotherapy for lung cancer.

Craig C Earle1, Peter J Neumann, Richard D Gelber, Milton C Weinstein, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the extent to which unexplained variation in the use of chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer is due to access to oncologists' services as opposed to treatment decisions made after seeing an oncologist.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 12,015 patients over age 65 diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer between 1991 and 1996 while living in one of 11 regions monitored by a Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry. Assessment by an oncologist and subsequent treatment with chemotherapy were determined by examining linked Medicare claims.
RESULTS: Of patients who did not receive chemotherapy, 36% were never assessed by a physician who provides chemotherapy. Patients living in certain areas, those diagnosed in more recent years, and those who received care in a teaching hospital were all more likely to see a cancer specialist. These factors were unrelated to subsequent treatment decisions, however. Conversely, age and comorbidity did not have a significant effect on whether a patient was seen by an oncologist, but they were associated with the likelihood of subsequently receiving chemotherapy. Black race, probably acting as a proxy for lower socioeconomic status, was associated with both a diminished likelihood of seeing a cancer specialist and subsequently receiving chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Nonmedical factors are important determinants of whether a lung cancer patient is seen by a physician who provides chemotherapy. After seeing such a physician, treatment decisions seem to be mostly explained by appropriate medical factors. Racial and socioeconomic disparities still exist at both steps, however. As therapeutic options expand, referring physicians must ensure that biases and barriers to care do not deprive patients of the opportunity to consider all of their treatment options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11919235     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.07.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  64 in total

Review 1.  Social, prognostic, and therapeutic factors associated with cancer survival: a population-based study in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Eric J Holowaty; Ethan Laukkanen; Isaac N Luginaah
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2003-11

2.  Family and friend interactions among African-American men deciding whether or not to have a prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Randy A Jones; Richard Steeves; Ishan Williams
Journal:  Urol Nurs       Date:  2010 May-Jun

3.  Collaboration Between Surgeons and Medical Oncologists and Outcomes for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Tanvir Hussain; Hsien-Yen Chang; Christine M Veenstra; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Health care organizations' use of data on race/ethnicity to address disparities in health care.

Authors:  David R Nerenz; Kelly A Hunt; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  External validation of medicare claims for breast cancer chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews.

Authors:  Xianglin L Du; Charles R Key; Lois Dickie; Ronald Darling; Jane M Geraci; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  An exploration of urban and rural differences in lung cancer survival among medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lisa R Shugarman; Melony E S Sorbero; Haijun Tian; Arvind K Jain; J Scott Ashwood
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Referral patterns and treatment choices for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a United States population-based study.

Authors:  Omar Hyder; Rebecca M Dodson; Hari Nathan; Joseph M Herman; David Cosgrove; Ihab Kamel; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Explaining black-white differences in receipt of recommended colon cancer treatment.

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; Sharon A Dobie; Kevin Billingsley; Yong Cai; George E Wright; Jason A Dominitz; William Barlow; Joan L Warren; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Results of platinum-based chemotherapy in unselected performance status (PS) 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Stéphane Jouveshomme; Florence Canoui-Poitrine; Aurélie Le Thuaut; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Influence of private practice setting and physician characteristics on the use of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly women.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Donna Buono; Russell B McBride; Wei Yann Tsai; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.