Katherine M Flegal1, Rong Wei, Cynthia Ogden. 1. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA. kflegal@cdc.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts for the United States include population reference data for body mass index (BMI)-for-age (ages 2-19 y) and weight-for-stature (from 77 to 121 cm). For younger children, either set of reference data could be used. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare BMI-for-age with weight-for-stature. DESIGN: We used data for 4348 children (aged 2-5 y) from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Weight-for-stature and BMI-for-age percentiles were calculated for each child. The 10th and 85th percentiles of weight-for-stature at selected ages were also reexpressed as BMI-for-age percentiles. RESULTS: More than 63% of children had lower weight-for-stature than BMI-for-age percentiles. Children were more likely to be classified as < or = 10th percentile by weight-for-stature than by BMI-for-age, but less likely to be classified as > or = 85th percentile. Differences in classification by the 2 measures varied with age and stature and were greater for shorter children. The 10th and 85th percentiles of weight-for-stature corresponded to BMI-for-age percentiles from the 3rd to the 21st percentile and from the 74th to the 92nd percentile, respectively, depending on age and stature. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-for-stature is easier to use than BMI-for-age. However, BMI-for-age captures changes in the weight-height relation with age and can be used continuously up to the age of 20 y. BMI-for-age is recommended in most situations. BMI-for-age and weight-for-stature will not give identical results and are not interchangeable.
BACKGROUND: The 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts for the United States include population reference data for body mass index (BMI)-for-age (ages 2-19 y) and weight-for-stature (from 77 to 121 cm). For younger children, either set of reference data could be used. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare BMI-for-age with weight-for-stature. DESIGN: We used data for 4348 children (aged 2-5 y) from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Weight-for-stature and BMI-for-age percentiles were calculated for each child. The 10th and 85th percentiles of weight-for-stature at selected ages were also reexpressed as BMI-for-age percentiles. RESULTS: More than 63% of children had lower weight-for-stature than BMI-for-age percentiles. Children were more likely to be classified as < or = 10th percentile by weight-for-stature than by BMI-for-age, but less likely to be classified as > or = 85th percentile. Differences in classification by the 2 measures varied with age and stature and were greater for shorter children. The 10th and 85th percentiles of weight-for-stature corresponded to BMI-for-age percentiles from the 3rd to the 21st percentile and from the 74th to the 92nd percentile, respectively, depending on age and stature. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-for-stature is easier to use than BMI-for-age. However, BMI-for-age captures changes in the weight-height relation with age and can be used continuously up to the age of 20 y. BMI-for-age is recommended in most situations. BMI-for-age and weight-for-stature will not give identical results and are not interchangeable.
Authors: Marianne S Muhlebach; Sonya L Heltshe; Elena B Popowitch; Melissa B Miller; Valeria Thompson; Margaret Kloster; Thomas Ferkol; Wynton C Hoover; Michael S Schechter; Lisa Saiman Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-06
Authors: Shan L Ward; Carson M Quinn; Martina A Steurer; Kathleen D Liu; Heidi R Flori; Michael A Matthay Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Daniel Simhaee; Nicole Corriveau; Roopa Gurm; Zachary Geiger; Eva Kline-Rogers; Caren Goldberg; Kim A Eagle; Elizabeth A Jackson Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Michele R Forman; Yeyi Zhu; Ladia M Hernandez; John H Himes; Yongquan Dong; Robert K Danish; Kyla E James; Laura E Caulfield; Jean M Kerver; Lenore Arab; Paula Voss; Daniel E Hale; Nadim Kanafani; Steven Hirschfeld Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Sonya L Heltshe; Lisa Saiman; Elena B Popowitch; Melissa B Miller; Margaret Kloster; Valeria Thompson; Thomas W Ferkol; Wynton C Hoover; Michael S Schechter; Marianne S Muhlebach Journal: J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Ian S Goldlust; Karen E Hermetz; Lisa M Catalano; Richard T Barfield; Rebecca Cozad; Grace Wynn; Alev Cagla Ozdemir; Karen N Conneely; Jennifer G Mulle; Shikha Dharamrup; Madhuri R Hegde; Katherine H Kim; Brad Angle; Alison Colley; Amy E Webb; Erik C Thorland; Jay W Ellison; Jill A Rosenfeld; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer; Laurie A Demmer; M Katharine Rudd Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 11.205