Literature DB >> 11914389

The use of landmarks and panoramic context in the performance of local vectors by navigating honeybees.

Matthew Collett1, Duane Harland, Thomas S Collett.   

Abstract

Bees seem to use landmarks to segment familiar routes. They can associate, with a landmark, a memory that encodes the direction and distance of the path segment between that landmark and the next. The expression of the memory results in the performance of a local vector matching the distance and direction of the path segment. The memories of path segments appear to be 'chained' together, so that the performance of one local vector is sometimes sufficient to elicit the subsequent local vector, even in the absence of the associated landmark. We have investigated the effect of visual panoramic context on the expression of local vectors. Bees were trained to fly along a narrow channel to collect sucrose from a feeder positioned partway along it. Panoramic context was provided by various types of patterning on the walls. The channel was partitioned into different segments using landmarks of two kinds: a boundary landmark that marked a change in the pattern on one or both side-walls of the channel, and an isolated landmark, consisting of a baffle through which the bee passed, for which the wall pattern was the same before as after. In tests, we removed the feeder and analysed the search distribution of the bees for various arrangements of landmarks. Altering the spatial relationship between landmarks has different consequences for the two types of landmark. If the final boundary landmark is shifted, the centre of the search distribution shifts by approximately the same amount. Changes in the position of an isolated landmark have a weaker effect. In the absence of the final context, the search is disrupted. We suggest that for local vectors to be expressed the surrounding panoramic context needs to be appropriate. A comparison of search patterns from two different training configurations of landmarks supports the hypothesis that local vector memories merely encode route segments and that global positional coordinates are not linked to landmark memories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11914389     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.6.807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  17 in total

1.  How desert ants use a visual landmark for guidance along a habitual route.

Authors:  Matthew Collett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Temporal maps in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Kathleen M Taylor; Victory Joseph; Alice S Zhao; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants negotiate an obstacle course?

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Sebastian Schwarz; Patrick Schultheiss; Guy Beugnon; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Route-segment odometry and its interactions with global path-integration.

Authors:  Thomas S Collett; Matthew Collett
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Homing in a tropical social wasp: role of spatial familiarity, motivation and age.

Authors:  Souvik Mandal; Anindita Brahma; Raghavendra Gadagkar
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Pheromone cue triggers switch between vectors in the desert harvest ant, Veromessor pergandei.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Jenna V Congdon; Nicola J R Plowes; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 7.  Recognition of a familiar place by the honeybee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  G A Horridge
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Spatial memory, navigation and dance behaviour in Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Randolf Menzel; Rodrigo J De Marco; Uwe Greggers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Relative temporal representations in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Michele Wan; Mamadou Djourthe; Kathleen M Taylor; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  A desert ant's memory of recent visual experience and the control of route guidance.

Authors:  Matthew Collett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.