Literature DB >> 11913842

The proximity-fixation-disparity curve and the preferred viewing distance at a visual display as an indicator of near vision fatigue.

Wolfgang Jaschinski1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This laboratory study investigates the relation between measures of fixation disparity (FD) (and other optometric measures) and near vision fatigue at a computer workstation.
METHODS: Young adult subjects with normal binocular vision performed three blocks of a visual task of 30 min each. In Block A, the viewing distance was 100 cm, as a reference without near vision. In Block B, the viewing distance of 50 cm induced a defined near vision load. In Block C, subjects were free to choose a comfortable viewing distance. This preferred viewing distance was used as an indicator of near vision fatigue because subjects adopting longer viewing distances in Block C had more near vision fatigue at 50 cm in Block B.
RESULTS: Subjects with preferred viewing distances longer than average (63 cm) had steeper slopes of FD as a function of viewing distance (100-30 cm), as shown by discriminant analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, this steep proximity-FD curve indicates a weak disparity vergence system that may cause near vision fatigue. This may explain why some young adults prefer longer viewing distances at the computer workstation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11913842     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200203000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  Dyslexic children are confronted with unstable binocular fixation while reading.

Authors:  Stephanie Jainta; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.

Authors:  Volkhard Schroth; Roland Joos; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of binocular function among pre- and early-presbyopes with asthenopia.

Authors:  William Reindel; Lening Zhang; Joseph Chinn; Marjorie Rah
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2018-01-04

5.  Binocular coordination and reading performance during smartphone reading in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Masakazu Hirota; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takao Endo; Takeshi Morimoto; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-16

6.  Visual and psychological stress during computer work in healthy, young females-physiological responses.

Authors:  Randi Mork; Helle K Falkenberg; Knut Inge Fostervold; Hanne Mari S Thorud
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Deficient vergence prism adaptation in subjects with decompensated heterophoria.

Authors:  Anna Przekoracka-Krawczyk; Krzysztof Piotr Michalak; Paulina Pyżalska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of aligning prisms on the objective and subjective fixation disparity in far distance.

Authors:  Volkhard Schroth; Roland Joos; Ewald Alshuth; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 0.957

10.  Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?

Authors:  Joanna M N Otto; Miriam Kromeier; Michael Bach; Guntram Kommerell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.117

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.