Literature DB >> 11912331

Accuracy of student self-assessment ability compared to their own performance in a problem-based learning medical program: a correlation study.

M Tousignant1, J E DesMarchais.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-assessment ability of students enrolled in a Problem-based Learning program.
METHODS: Seventy students enrolled in their third year of a four-year program were invited to voluntarily participate in the study. Self-assessment questionnaire was used to measure the students' self-assessment ability on two different occasions: 1) prior to standardised oral examination in predicting their performance, and 2) following the examination estimating their performance. The accuracy of the self-assessment was investigated by the relation between self-assessment and performance of the students.
RESULTS: Our study showed that self-assessment pre-examination was not accurate compared to performance at the oral examination (r ranging from 0.042 to 0.243). However, accuracy is slightly better when the student self-assesses his performance a posteriori, but the relation stays very low (r ranging from 0.257 to 0.334).
CONCLUSION: According to our results, the students in the third year of a self-directed Problem-based Learning medical four year program demonstrated poor accuracy of the self-assessment when compared to their own performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11912331     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014516206120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills: implementing a 360-degree evaluation instrument in an anesthesiology residency program.

Authors:  Li Meng; David G Metro; Rita M Patel
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-12

2.  Self-assessment in the measurement of public health workforce preparedness for bioterrorism or other public health disasters.

Authors:  Dave S Kerby; Michael W Brand; David L Johnson; Farooq S Ghouri
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Student knowledge and confidence in an elective clinical toxicology course using active-learning techniques.

Authors:  Michael C Thomas; Liliairica Z Macias-Moriarity
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  How prepared are foundation dentists in England and Wales for independent general dental practice?

Authors:  M Ray; A Milston; P Doherty; S Crean
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Enhancing students' learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking.

Authors:  Umatul Khoiriyah; Chris Roberts; Christine Jorm; C P M Van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  How well do doctors think they perform on the General Medical Council's Tests of Competence pilot examinations? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Leila Mehdizadeh; Alison Sturrock; Gil Myers; Yasmin Khatib; Jane Dacre
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Correlation of online assessment parameters with summative exam performance in undergraduate medical education of pharmacology: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Felizian Kühbeck; Pascal O Berberat; Stefan Engelhardt; Antonio Sarikas
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 8.  Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review.

Authors:  Joan Carles Trullàs; Carles Blay; Elisabet Sarri; Ramon Pujol
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Effectiveness of PBL methodology in a hybrid dentistry program to enhance students' knowledge and confidence. (a pilot study).

Authors:  Ebtissam M Al-Madi; Sree Lalita Celur; Mamoona Nasim
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.