Literature DB >> 11907412

C1-inhibitor for prophylaxis of xenograft rejection after pig to cynomolgus monkey kidney transplantation.

Jens M Hecker1, Ralf Lorenz, Richard Appiah, Burkhard Vangerow, Martin Loss, Robert Kunz, Jan Schmidtko, Michael Mengel, Jürgen Klempnauer, Siegfried Piepenbrock, Gerhard Dickneite, Helge Neidhardt, Horst Rückoldt, Michael Winkler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early rejection of discordant porcine xenografts in primate recipients is initiated by the intragraft binding of either preformed (hyperacute xenograft rejection) or induced (acute vascular rejection) antiporcine recipient antibodies with subsequent complement activation via the classical pathway. We have investigated the efficacy of the supplemental administration of C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), a specific inhibitor of the classical complement activation pathway, for prophylaxis of xenograft rejection in a pig to primate kidney xenotransplantation setting.
METHODS: Based on the results of pharmacokinetic studies performed in two nontransplanted monkeys, supplemental C1-INH therapy was administered daily to three Cynomolgus monkeys receiving a life-supporting porcine kidney transplant together with cyclophosphamide-induction/cyclosporine A/mycophenolat-mofetil/steroid immunosuppressive therapy.
RESULTS: In the three monkeys receiving porcine kidney xenografts and continuous C1-INH treatment none of the grafts underwent hyperacute rejection; all xenografts showed initial function. Recipient survival was 13, 15, and 5 days. No graft was lost due to acute vascular rejection. All animals died with a functioning graft (latest creatinine 96, 112, and 96 micromol/liter) due to bacterial septicemia.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that, in our model, supplemental C1-INH therapy together with a standard immunosuppressive regimen can be helpful for prevention of xenograft rejection in a pig to primate kidney xenotransplantation setting. The optimal dose and duration of C1-INH treatment, however, has yet to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11907412     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200203150-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  Xenotransplantation: where are we today?

Authors:  M D Dooldeniya; A N Warrens
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  C1 inhibitor: biologic activities that are independent of protease inhibition.

Authors:  Alvin E Davis; Shenghe Cai; Dongxu Liu
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 3.144

Review 3.  Antibody-mediated xenograft injury: mechanisms and protective strategies.

Authors:  Richard N Pierson
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 1.708

Review 4.  Biological activities of C1 inhibitor.

Authors:  Alvin E Davis; Pedro Mejia; Fengxin Lu
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 5.  Bench-to-bedside review: the role of C1-esterase inhibitor in sepsis and other critical illnesses.

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Annie M Jones
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.