Literature DB >> 11906919

Mosaic gene expression in nuclear transfer-derived embryos and the production of cloned transgenic pigs from ear-derived fibroblasts.

Kwang-Wook Park1, Liangxue Lai, Hee-Tae Cheong, Ryan Cabot, Qing-Yuan Sun, Guangming Wu, Edmund B Rucker, David Durtschi, Aaron Bonk, Melissa Samuel, A Rieke, Bill N Day, Clifton N Murphy, D B Carter, Randall S Prather.   

Abstract

Genetically modified domestic animals have many potential applications ranging from basic research to production agriculture. One of the goals in transgenic animal production schemes is to reliably predict the expression pattern of the foreign gene. Establishing a method to screen genetically modified embryos for transgene expression before transfer to surrogates may improve the likelihood of producing offspring with the desired expression pattern. In order to determine how transgene expression may be regulated in the early embryo, we generated porcine embryos from two distinct genetically modified cell lines by using the nuclear transfer (NT) technique. Both cell lines expressed the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP); the first was a fibroblast cell line derived from the skin of a newborn pig that expressed eGFP, whereas the second was a fetal derived fibroblast cell line into which the eGFP gene was introduced by a retroviral vector. The reconstructed embryos were activated by electrical pulses and cultured in NCSU23. Although the in vitro developmental ability of each group of NT embryos was not different, the eGFP expression pattern was different. All embryos produced from the transduced fetal cell line fluoresced, but only 26% of the embryos generated from the newborn cell line fluoresced, and among those that did express eGFP, more than half had a mosaic expression pattern. This was unexpected because the fetal cell line was not clonally selected, and each cell had potentially different sites of integration. Embryos generated from the newborn cell line were surgically transferred to five surrogate gilts. One gilt delivered four female piglets, all of which expressed eGFP, and all had microsatellites identical to the donor. Here we demonstrate that transgene expression in all the blastomeres of an NT embryo is not uniform. In addition, transgene expression in a genetically manipulated embryo may not be an accurate indicator of expression in the resulting offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11906919     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod66.4.1001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  21 in total

1.  Altered gene expression profiles in the brain, kidney, and lung of deceased neonatal cloned pigs.

Authors:  Joonghoon Park; Sadie L Marjani; Liangxue Lai; Melissa Samuel; David Wax; Steven R Davis; Richard S Bruno; Randall S Prather; Xiangzhong Yang; Xiuchun Cindy Tian
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  Handmade cloned transgenic piglets expressing the nematode fat-1 gene.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Yidi Zhang; Hongwei Dou; Jingdong Yin; Yu Chen; Xinzhi Pang; Gabor Vajta; Lars Bolund; Yutao Du; Runlin Z Ma
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.987

3.  Production of transgenic dairy goat expressing human α-lactalbumin by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Xiujing Feng; Shaoxian Cao; Huili Wang; Chunhua Meng; Jingxin Li; Jin Jiang; Yong Qian; Lei Su; Qiang He; Qingxiao Zhang
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Production of heterozygous alpha 1,3-galactosyltransferase (GGTA1) knock-out transgenic miniature pigs expressing human CD39.

Authors:  Kimyung Choi; Joohyun Shim; Nayoung Ko; Heejong Eom; Jiho Kim; Jeong-Woong Lee; Dong-Il Jin; Hyunil Kim
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Pig transgenesis by Sleeping Beauty DNA transposition.

Authors:  Jannik E Jakobsen; Juan Li; Peter M Kragh; Brian Moldt; Lin Lin; Ying Liu; Mette Schmidt; Kjeld Dahl Winther; Brian Dall Schyth; Ida E Holm; Gábor Vajta; Lars Bolund; Henrik Callesen; Arne Lund Jørgensen; Anders Lade Nielsen; Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Pluripotency deficit in clones overcome by clone-clone aggregation: epigenetic complementation?

Authors:  Michele Boiani; Sigrid Eckardt; N Adrian Leu; Hans R Schöler; K John McLaughlin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Viral transduction of male germline stem cells results in transgene transmission after germ cell transplantation in pigs.

Authors:  Wenxian Zeng; Lin Tang; Alla Bondareva; Ali Honaramooz; Valeria Tanco; Camila Dores; Susan Megee; Mark Modelski; Jose Rafael Rodriguez-Sosa; Melissa Paczkowski; Elena Silva; Matt Wheeler; Rebecca L Krisher; Ina Dobrinski
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Transgene expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein in cloned rabbits generated from in vitro-transfected adult fibroblasts.

Authors:  Shangang Li; Yi Guo; Jianjun Shi; Chunguang Yin; Fengying Xing; Lingyang Xu; Chuanshan Zhang; Tao Liu; Yao Li; Hongbin Li; Lixin Du; Xuejin Chen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  In vitro development of porcine transgenic nuclear-transferred embryos derived from newborn Guangxi Bama mini-pig kidney fibroblasts.

Authors:  Hongbo Liu; Peiru Lv; Xiangxing Zhu; Xianwei Wang; Xiaogan Yang; Erwei Zuo; Yangqing Lu; Shengsheng Lu; Kehuan Lu
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 2.416

10.  Transgene expression is associated with copy number and cytomegalovirus promoter methylation in transgenic pigs.

Authors:  Qingran Kong; Meiling Wu; Yanjun Huan; Li Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Gerelchimeg Bou; Yibo Luo; Yanshuang Mu; Zhonghua Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.