Literature DB >> 14517267

Pluripotency deficit in clones overcome by clone-clone aggregation: epigenetic complementation?

Michele Boiani1, Sigrid Eckardt, N Adrian Leu, Hans R Schöler, K John McLaughlin.   

Abstract

Abnormal gene expression patterns in somatic cell clones and their attrition in utero are commonly considered a consequence of errors in nuclear reprogramming. We observe that mouse clone blastocysts have less than half the normal cell number, and that higher cell number correlates with correct expression of Oct4, a gene essential for peri-implantation development and embryonic pluripotency. To increase the cell number, we aggregated genetically identical clones at the 4-cell stage. Clone-clone aggregates did not form more blastocysts, but the majority expressed Oct4 normally and had higher rates of fetal and postnatal development. Fertilized blastocysts with low cell numbers, induced by removal of two blastomeres at the 4-cell stage, did not exhibit abnormal Oct4 expression, indicating that improved gene expression and post-implantation development of clone-clone aggregates is not a consequence of increased cell number. Rather, we propose that complementation of non-cell-autonomous defects of genetically identical, but epigenetically different, embryos results in improved gene expression in clone-clone aggregates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14517267      PMCID: PMC204490          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdg507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  40 in total

Review 1.  Apoptosis at the time of embryo implantation in mouse and rat.

Authors:  S Pampfer; I Donnay
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 15.828

2.  In vitro development of reconstructed porcine oocytes after somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  D B Koo; Y K Kang; Y H Choi; J S Park; S K Han; I Y Park; S U Kim; K K Lee; D S Son; W K Chang; Y M Han
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 3.  Size control in animal development.

Authors:  I Conlon; M Raff
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-01-22       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Surface-expressed E-cadherin, and mitochondrial and microtubule distribution in rescue of mouse embryos from 2-cell block by aggregation.

Authors:  I E Neganova; G G Sekirina; U Eichenlaub-Ritter
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse.

Authors:  Y Kimura; R Yanagimachi
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Chromatin and microtubule organization in the first cell cycle in rabbit parthenotes and nuclear transplant embryos.

Authors:  C Pinto-Correia; P Collas; F A Ponce de Leon; J M Robl
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.609

7.  Developmental ability of zona-free mouse embryos is influenced by cell association at the 4-cell stage.

Authors:  H Suzuki; M Togashi; J Adachi; Y Toyoda
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Intercellular communication in in vivo- and in vitro-produced bovine embryos.

Authors:  R Boni; E Tosti; S Roviello; B Dale
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  New type of POU domain in germ line-specific protein Oct-4.

Authors:  H R Schöler; S Ruppert; N Suzuki; K Chowdhury; P Gruss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells.

Authors:  Y I Yeom; G Fuhrmann; C E Ovitt; A Brehm; K Ohbo; M Gross; K Hübner; H R Schöler
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  22 in total

1.  Oct-3/4 maintains the proliferative embryonic stem cell state via specific binding to a variant octamer sequence in the regulatory region of the UTF1 locus.

Authors:  Masazumi Nishimoto; Satoru Miyagi; Toshiyuki Yamagishi; Takehisa Sakaguchi; Hitoshi Niwa; Masami Muramatsu; Akihiko Okuda
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Transgenic chicken, mice, cattle, and pig embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer into pig oocytes.

Authors:  Mukesh Kumar Gupta; Ziban Chandra Das; Young Tae Heo; Jin Young Joo; Hak-Jae Chung; Hyuk Song; Jae-Hwan Kim; Nam-Hyung Kim; Hoon Taek Lee; Dae Hwan Ko; Sang Jun Uhm
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 3.  Reprogramming somatic gene activity by fusion with pluripotent cells.

Authors:  Jeong Tae Do; Dong Wook Han; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Valproic acid improves the in vitro development competence of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  Wenbing Xu; Yongsheng Wang; Yanyan Li; Lijun Wang; Xianrong Xiong; Jianmin Su; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  Buffalo embryos produced by handmade cloning from oocytes selected using brilliant cresyl blue staining have better developmental competence and quality and are closer to embryos produced by in vitro fertilization in terms of their epigenetic status and gene expression pattern.

Authors:  Sushil K Mohapatra; Anjit Sandhu; Venkata S Neerukattu; Karn P Singh; Naresh L Selokar; Suresh K Singla; Manmohan S Chauhan; Radhey S Manik; Prabhat Palta
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.987

6.  Loss of maternal ATRX results in centromere instability and aneuploidy in the mammalian oocyte and pre-implantation embryo.

Authors:  Claudia Baumann; Maria M Viveiros; Rabindranath De La Fuente
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Constitutive expression of the embryonic stem cell marker OCT4 in bovine somatic donor cells influences blastocysts rate and quality after nucleus transfer.

Authors:  Lleretny Rodríguez-Alvarez; Jose Manriquez; Alejandra Velasquez; Fidel Ovidio Castro
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.416

8.  The influence of DNA sequence on epigenome-induced pathologies.

Authors:  Richard B Meagher; Kristofer J Müssar
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.954

9.  Nuclear reprogramming: kinetics of cell cycle and metabolic progression as determinants of success.

Authors:  Sebastian Thomas Balbach; Telma Cristina Esteves; Franchesca Dawn Houghton; Marcin Siatkowski; Martin Johannes Pfeiffer; Chizuko Tsurumi; Benoit Kanzler; Georg Fuellen; Michele Boiani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  De novo DNA methylation promoted by G9a prevents reprogramming of embryonically silenced genes.

Authors:  Silvina Epsztejn-Litman; Nirit Feldman; Monther Abu-Remaileh; Yoel Shufaro; Ariela Gerson; Jun Ueda; Rachel Deplus; François Fuks; Yoichi Shinkai; Howard Cedar; Yehudit Bergman
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.