Literature DB >> 11901449

[HYGEA (Hygiene in gastroenterology--endoscope reprocessing): Study on quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes in hospitals and in the practice setting].

L Bader1, G Blumenstock, B Birkner, O Leiss, J Heesemann, J F Riemann, H-K Selbmann.   

Abstract

The quality of reprocessing gastroscopes, colonoscopes and duodenoscopes in daily routine of 25 endoscopy departments in hospitals and 30 doctors with their own practices was evaluated by microbiological testing in the HYGEA interventional study. In 2 test periods, endoscopes ready for use in patients were found contaminated at high rates (period 1: 49 % of 152 endoscopes; period 2: 39 % of 154 endoscopes). Culture of bacterial fecal flora (E. coli, coliform enterobacteriaceae, enterococci) was interpreted indicating failure of cleaning procedure and disinfection of endoscopes. Detection of Pseudomonas spp. (especially P. aeruginosa) and other non-fermenting rods - indicating microbially insufficient final rinsing and incomplete drying of the endoscope or a contaminated flushing equipment for the air/water-channel - pointed out endoscope recontamination during reprocessing or afterwards. Cause for complaint was found in more than 50 % of endoscopy facilities tested (period 2: 5 in hospitals, 25 practices). Reprocessing endoscopes in fully automatic chemo-thermally decontaminating washer-disinfectors with disinfection of final rinsing water led to much better results than manual or semi-automatic procedures (failure rate of endoscopy facilities in period 2 : 3 of 28 with fully automatic, 8 of 12 with manual, 9 of 15 with semi-automatic reprocessing). The study results give evidence for the following recommendations: 1. Manual brushing of all accessible endoscope channels has to be performed even before further automatic reprocessing; 2. For final endoscope rinsing, water or aqua dest. should only be used disinfected or sterile-filtered; 3. Endoscopes have to be dried thoroughly using compressed air prior to storage; 4. Bottle and tube for air/water-channel flushing have to be reprocessed daily by disinfection or sterilization, and in use, the bottle have to be filled exclusively with sterile water. The HYGEA study shows that microbiological testing of endoscopes is useful for detection of insufficient reprocessing and should be performed for quality assurance in doctors' practices, too. The study put recommendations for reprocessing procedures in more concrete terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11901449     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-22326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0044-2771            Impact factor:   2.000


  12 in total

1.  [Reprocessing rigid and flexible cystoscopes in urology: recommendations for ambulant practices].

Authors:  U Heudorf; U Otto; O Leiss; M Wiesel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The safe processing of medical devices in the interests of patient protection.

Authors:  Axel Kramer; Ojan Assadian; Christian Jäkel; Marc Kraft
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2008-09-03

Review 3.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 4.  Hygiene: The Looming Achilles Heel in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Michael Jung; Ulrike Beilenhoff
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-02-10

5.  ATP measurement as method to monitor the quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes.

Authors:  Dorothea Hansen; Daniel Benner; Martin Hilgenhöner; Therese Leisebein; Andreas Brauksiepe; Walter Popp
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2004-04-26

Review 6.  [New possibilities with retroflexed functional endoscopy].

Authors:  I F Herrmann; M Gadebusch Bondio; D Domagk; M Strahl; C Arens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group.

Authors:  T R Levin; F A Farraye; R E Schoen; G Hoff; W Atkin; J H Bond; S Winawer; R W Burt; D A Johnson; L M Kirk; S C Litin; D K Rex
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Survey of endoscope reprocessing in Korea.

Authors:  Jeong Bae Park; Jae Nam Yang; Yun Jeong Lim; Ja Seol Koo; Jae Young Jang; Sang Hoon Park; Su Jin Hong; Sang-Woo Kim; Hoon Jai Chun
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-01-31

Review 9.  Endoscope Reprocessing: Update on Controversial Issues.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Choi; Young-Seok Cho
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30

10.  Quality control in colorectal cancer screening: systematic microbiological investigation of endoscopes used in the NORCCAP (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention) trial.

Authors:  Michael Bretthauer; Anita Jørgensen; Bjørn Erik Kristiansen; Bjørn Hofstad; Geir Hoff
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.