Literature DB >> 11899786

The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.

E Burnside1, J Belkora, L Esserman.   

Abstract

The decentralized structure of health care in the Unites States hinders population-based analysis of breast cancer screening. Our objectives are to model mammography in the United States as a whole, to identify the variables that most profoundly affect cost and efficacy, and to develop a strategy to improve mammography screening from a population perspective. A spreadsheet model was used to represent the variables of mammography screening in the United States. The population-based national screening program in Sweden provides a framework for comparison. The outcome measures are the aggregate cost and the number of cancers detected by mammography. We used deterministic sensitivity analysis to calculate the impact of variation in practice. Aggregate costs of screening in the United States are in the range of $3-$5 billion dollars. The percentage of women screened, cost per mammogram, cancer to biopsy ratio, recall rate, and cost of recall have the most profound effect on the quality and cost of a national screening program. Variance of these high-impact variables, based on the U.S. population, modifies the aggregate cost of screening by over $2 billion. As mammography screening in the United States increases to include all women over age 40, high-impact variables should be optimized to decrease costs and improve breast cancer detection. Our model establishes which parameters are most important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11899786     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2001.n.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  The Effect of Budgetary Restrictions on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Decisions.

Authors:  Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Manuf Serv Oper Manag       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.600

2.  Breast cancer screening, diagnostic accuracy and health care policies.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Urbain
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Utilization and Cost of Mammography Screening Among Commercially Insured Women 50 to 64 Years of Age in the United States, 2012-2016.

Authors:  Jaya S Khushalani; Donatus U Ekwueme; Thomas B Richards; Susan A Sabatino; Gery P Guy; Yuanhui Zhang; Florence Tangka
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines.

Authors:  Cristina O'Donoghue; Martin Eklund; Elissa M Ozanne; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; Sebastien J P A Haneuse; Edward A Sickles; Robert A Smith; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Robert D Rosenberg; Berta M Geller; Tracy L Onega; Barbara S Monsees; Lawrence W Bassett; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Jules H Sumkin; Marie A Ganott; Denise M Chough; Victor J Catullo; Margarita L Zuley; Dilip D Shinde; Christiane M Hakim; Andriy I Bandos; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.173

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.