Literature DB >> 11899144

Patient satisfaction with teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life.

T L Williams1, A Esmail, C R May, C E Griffiths, N T Shaw, D Fitzgerald, E Stewart, M Mould, M Morgan, L Pickup, S Kelly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of good data about patient satisfaction with teledermatology and about its potential interaction with quality-of-life factors.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between perceived skin-related quality of life and patient satisfaction with a nurse-led teledermatology service.
METHODS: In a mobile nurse-led teledermatology clinic located in four inner city general practices in Manchester, the teledermatology service used digital cameras to capture and store images of skin conditions for remote diagnosis by dermatologists. One hundred and twenty-three adult patients, non-urgent dermatology referrals from primary care, completed the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and a 15-item patient satisfaction questionnaire.
RESULTS: In common with other studies of patient satisfaction, subjects reported highly favourable views of 'hotel' aspects of the service (93%) and found it 'convenient' (86%). However, 40% of patients would have preferred to have had a conventional face-to-face consultation with a dermatologist, and 17% felt unable to speak freely about their condition. Patient satisfaction with the service was related to quality of life. Patients reporting lower quality of life as measured by the DLQI were more likely to prefer a face-to-face encounter with a dermatologist (r = 0.216, P < 0.05), and to evince anxiety about being photographed (r = 0.223, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient acceptance and satisfaction with telemedicine services is complicated by patients' subjective health status. Telehealthcare providers need to recognize that patients with poor quality of life may want and benefit from face-to-face interaction with expert clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11899144     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04472.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  10 in total

1.  Development, validation, and use of English and Spanish versions of the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire.

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken; Lorena Grullon-Figueroa; Roberto Izquierdo; Nam-Ju Lee; Philip Morin; Walter Palmas; Jeanne Teresi; Ruth S Weinstock; Steven Shea; Justin Starren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology.

Authors:  George Demiris; Stuart M Speedie; Lanis L Hicks
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Teledermatology: the use of ubiquitous technology to redefine traditional medical instruction, collaboration, and consultation.

Authors:  Richard Brandt; David Hensley
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2012-11

4.  Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Teledermatology.

Authors:  Richard Marchell; Craig Locatis; Gene Burgess; Richard Maisiak; Wei-Li Liu; Michael Ackerman
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  Effect of store and forward teledermatology on quality of life: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John D Whited; Erin M Warshaw; Karen E Edison; Kush Kapur; Lizy Thottapurathu; Srihari Raju; Bethany Cook; Holly Engasser; Samantha Pullen; Patricia Parks; Tom Sindowski; Danuta Motyka; Rodney Brown; Thomas E Moritz; Santanu K Datta; Mary-Margaret Chren; Lucinda Marty; Domenic J Reda
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 10.282

6.  Technological preferences of aging cancer patients for delivery services and devices to solve drug-related problems in oncology.

Authors:  Kevin Yi-Lwern Yap; Yvonne Chia; Xiu Hui Low; Alexandre Chan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology.

Authors:  Calvin K L Or; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Development of a teledermatopathology consultation system using virtual slides.

Authors:  Ikunori Nakayama; Tsubasa Matsumura; Akihisa Kamataki; Miwa Uzuki; Kenji Saito; James Hobbs; Toshihide Akasaka; Takashi Sawai
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 9.  Teledermatology: An updated overview of clinical applications and reimbursement policies.

Authors:  M Campagna; F Naka; J Lu
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-20

10.  Teledermatology: Comparison of Store-and-Forward Versus Live Interactive Video Conferencing.

Authors:  Titus Josef Brinker; Achim Hekler; Christof von Kalle; Dirk Schadendorf; Stefan Esser; Carola Berking; Martina T Zacher; Wiebke Sondermann; Niels Grabe; Theresa Steeb; Jochen Sven Utikal; Lars E French; Alexander H Enk
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.