Richard Marchell1, Craig Locatis2, Gene Burgess1, Richard Maisiak3, Wei-Li Liu2, Michael Ackerman2. 1. 1 Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina. 2. 2 National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland. 3. 3 University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is little research comparing dermatologist and patient satisfaction with in-person, store-and-forward, and live interactive examinations. OBJECTIVE: To compare satisfaction with in-person examinations to store-and-forward and live interactive consultations having two types of video. METHODS: A controlled study was conducted where patients referred for dermatology consultations were examined in-person, by video, and by store-and-forward methods. Video changed between compressed and uncompressed on alternate clinics. Patients and dermatologists rated encounters after each examination. Dermatologists doing store-and-forward evaluations rated the quality of information provided. After experiencing all methods patients ranked their preferences. Dermatologists ranked their preferences at the end of the study. RESULTS: In-person examinations were preferred by both patients and dermatologists. Overall, satisfaction with teledermatology was still high. Patients were evenly divided in preferring store-and-forward workups or live interactive video. Dermatologists were also divided on store-and-forward and uncompressed video, but tended toward the latter. Compressed video was the least preferred method among dermatologists. LIMITATIONS: Dermatology residents took store-and-forward photos and their quality was likely superior to those normally taken in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and dermatologists prefer in-person examinations and diverge on preferring store-and-forward and live interactive when video is not compressed. The amount of video compression that can be applied without noticeable image degradation is a question for future research.
BACKGROUND: There is little research comparing dermatologist and patient satisfaction with in-person, store-and-forward, and live interactive examinations. OBJECTIVE: To compare satisfaction with in-person examinations to store-and-forward and live interactive consultations having two types of video. METHODS: A controlled study was conducted where patients referred for dermatology consultations were examined in-person, by video, and by store-and-forward methods. Video changed between compressed and uncompressed on alternate clinics. Patients and dermatologists rated encounters after each examination. Dermatologists doing store-and-forward evaluations rated the quality of information provided. After experiencing all methods patients ranked their preferences. Dermatologists ranked their preferences at the end of the study. RESULTS: In-person examinations were preferred by both patients and dermatologists. Overall, satisfaction with teledermatology was still high. Patients were evenly divided in preferring store-and-forward workups or live interactive video. Dermatologists were also divided on store-and-forward and uncompressed video, but tended toward the latter. Compressed video was the least preferred method among dermatologists. LIMITATIONS: Dermatology residents took store-and-forward photos and their quality was likely superior to those normally taken in practice. CONCLUSIONS:Patients and dermatologists prefer in-person examinations and diverge on preferring store-and-forward and live interactive when video is not compressed. The amount of video compression that can be applied without noticeable image degradation is a question for future research.
Authors: Christoph Ebner; Elisabeth Mt Wurm; Barbara Binder; Harald Kittler; Gian Piero Lozzi; Cesare Massone; Gerald Gabler; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; H Peter Soyer Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2008 Impact factor: 6.184
Authors: J Frühauf; S Kröck; F Quehenberger; D Kopera; R Fink-Puches; P Komericki; S Pucher; E Arzberger; R Hofmann-Wellenhof Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Richard Marchell; Craig Locatis; Gene Burges; Richard Maisiak; Wei-Li Liu; Michael Ackerman Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 3.536