Literature DB >> 11895967

Mucosal or parenteral administration of microsphere-associated Bacillus anthracis protective antigen protects against anthrax infection in mice.

Helen C Flick-Smith1, Jim E Eyles, Richard Hebdon, Emma L Waters, Richard J Beedham, Tony J Stagg, Julie Miller, H Oya Alpar, Les W J Baillie, E Diane Williamson.   

Abstract

Existing licensed anthrax vaccines are administered parenterally and require multiple doses to induce protective immunity. This requires trained personnel and is not the optimum route for stimulating a mucosal immune response. Microencapsulation of vaccine antigens offers a number of advantages over traditional vaccine formulations, including stability without refrigeration and the potential for utilizing less invasive routes of administration. Recombinant protective antigen (rPA), the dominant antigen for protection against anthrax infection, was encapsulated in poly-L-lactide 100-kDa microspheres. Alternatively, rPA was loosely attached to the surfaces of microspheres by lyophilization. All of the microspheric formulations were administered to A/J mice with a two-dose schedule by either the intramuscular route, the intranasal route, or a combination of these two routes, and immunogenicity and protective efficacy were assessed. An intramuscular priming immunization followed by either an intramuscular or intranasal boost gave optimum anti-rPA immunoglobulin G titers. Despite differences in rPA-specific antibody titers, all immunized mice survived an injected challenge consisting of 10(3) median lethal doses of Bacillus anthracis STI spores. Immunization with microencapsulated and microsphere-associated formulations of rPA also protected against aerosol challenge with 30 median lethal doses of STI spores. These results show that rPA can be encapsulated and surface bound to polymeric microspheres without impairing its immunogenicity and also that mucosal or parenteral administration of microspheric formulations of rPA efficiently protects mice against both injected and aerosol challenges with B. anthracis spores. Microspheric formulations of rPA could represent the next generation of anthrax vaccines, which could require fewer doses because they are more potent, are less reactogenic than currently available human anthrax vaccines, and could be self-administered without injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11895967      PMCID: PMC127835          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.4.2022-2028.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  20 in total

1.  The efficiency of various liquid impinger samplers in bacterial aerosols.

Authors:  K R MAY; G J HARPER
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1957-10

2.  The respiratory retention of bacterial aerosols: experiments with radioactive spores.

Authors:  G J HARPER; J D MORTON
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1953-09

3.  An apparatus for the study of airborne infection.

Authors:  D W HENDERSON
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1952-03

4.  Development of antibodies to protective antigen and lethal factor components of anthrax toxin in humans and guinea pigs and their relevance to protective immunity.

Authors:  P C Turnbull; M G Broster; J A Carman; R J Manchee; J Melling
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Presentation of protective antigen to the mouse immune system: immune sequelae.

Authors:  E D Williamson; R J Beedham; A M Bennett; S D Perkins; J Miller; L W Baillie
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Protection studies following bronchopulmonary and intramuscular immunisation with yersinia pestis F1 and V subunit vaccines coencapsulated in biodegradable microspheres: a comparison of efficacy.

Authors:  J E Eyles; E D Williamson; I D Spiers; H O Alpar
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Protective efficacy of a recombinant protective antigen against Bacillus anthracis challenge and assessment of immunological markers.

Authors:  B W McBride; A Mogg; J L Telfer; M S Lever; J Miller; P C Turnbull; L Baillie
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Comparative efficacy of experimental anthrax vaccine candidates against inhalation anthrax in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  B E Ivins; M L Pitt; P F Fellows; J W Farchaus; G E Benner; D M Waag; S F Little; G W Anderson; P H Gibbs; A M Friedlander
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Anthrax toxin protective antigen is activated by a cell surface protease with the sequence specificity and catalytic properties of furin.

Authors:  K R Klimpel; S S Molloy; G Thomas; S H Leppla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Macrophages are sensitive to anthrax lethal toxin through an acid-dependent process.

Authors:  A M Friedlander
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1986-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  24 in total

1.  Analysis of antibody responses to protective antigen-based anthrax vaccines through use of competitive assays.

Authors:  Rebecca A Brady; Anita Verma; Bruce D Meade; Drusilla L Burns
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-07-14

2.  Evaluation of combinatorial vaccines against anthrax and plague in a murine model.

Authors:  Amanda B DuBois; Lucy C Freytag; John D Clements
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Display of proteins on Bacillus subtilis endospores.

Authors:  Junehyung Kim; Wolfgang Schumann
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Towards a human oral vaccine for anthrax: the utility of a Salmonella Typhi Ty21a-based prime-boost immunization strategy.

Authors:  Leslie W J Baillie; Ana L Rodriguez; Stephen Moore; Helen S Atkins; Chiguang Feng; James P Nataro; Marcela F Pasetti
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Mucosal priming of newborn mice with S. Typhi Ty21a expressing anthrax protective antigen (PA) followed by parenteral PA-boost induces B and T cell-mediated immunity that protects against infection bypassing maternal antibodies.

Authors:  Karina Ramirez; Yanina Ditamo; James E Galen; Les W J Baillie; Marcela F Pasetti
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Microneedle-based intradermal delivery of the anthrax recombinant protective antigen vaccine.

Authors:  John A Mikszta; John P Dekker; Noel G Harvey; Cheryl H Dean; John M Brittingham; Joanne Huang; Vincent J Sullivan; Beverly Dyas; Chad J Roy; Robert G Ulrich
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Stable dry powder formulation for nasal delivery of anthrax vaccine.

Authors:  Sheena H Wang; Shaun M Kirwan; Soman N Abraham; Herman F Staats; Anthony J Hickey
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 8.  Binary bacterial toxins: biochemistry, biology, and applications of common Clostridium and Bacillus proteins.

Authors:  Holger Barth; Klaus Aktories; Michel R Popoff; Bradley G Stiles
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  A single immunization with a dry powder anthrax vaccine protects rabbits against lethal aerosol challenge.

Authors:  S D Klas; C R Petrie; S J Warwood; M S Williams; C L Olds; J P Stenz; A M Cheff; M Hinchcliffe; C Richardson; S Wimer
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  An adenovirus-vectored nasal vaccine confers rapid and sustained protection against anthrax in a single-dose regimen.

Authors:  Jianfeng Zhang; Edward Jex; Tsungwei Feng; Gloria S Sivko; Leslie W Baillie; Stanley Goldman; Kent R Van Kampen; De-chu C Tang
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.