Literature DB >> 11895011

The auditory processing battery: survey of common practices.

Diana C Emanuel1.   

Abstract

A survey of auditory processing (AP) diagnostic practices was mailed to all licensed audiologists in the State of Maryland and sent as an electronic mail attachment to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and Educational Audiology Association Internet forums. Common AP protocols (25 from the Internet, 28 from audiologists in Maryland) included requiring basic audiologic testing, using questionnaires, and administering dichotic listening, monaural low-redundancy speech, temporal processing, and electrophysiologic tests. Some audiologists also administer binaural interaction, attention, memory, and speech-language/psychological/educational tests and incorporate a classroom observation. The various AP batteries presently administered appear to be based on the availability of AP tests with well-documented normative data. Resources for obtaining AP tests are listed.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11895011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  9 in total

1.  Behavioral profiles associated with auditory processing disorder and specific language impairment.

Authors:  Carol A Miller; David A Wagstaff
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  A twin study of auditory processing indicates that dichotic listening ability is a strongly heritable trait.

Authors:  Robert J Morell; Carmen C Brewer; Dongliang Ge; Harold Snieder; Christopher K Zalewski; Kelly A King; Dennis Drayna; Thomas B Friedman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Management of Auditory Processing Difficulties Virtually: A Case Study.

Authors:  Virginia Amy Milne
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-08-02

4.  Psychometric profile of children with auditory processing disorder and children with dyslexia.

Authors:  Piers Dawes; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Left ear advantage in speech-related dichotic listening is not specific to auditory processing disorder in children: A machine-learning fMRI and DTI study.

Authors:  Vincent J Schmithorst; Rola Farah; Robert W Keith
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 6.  Medial efferent mechanisms in children with auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery.

Authors:  Mohsin Ahmed Shaikh; Lisa Fox-Thomas; Denise Tucker
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2016-11-25

8.  The practices, challenges and recommendations of South African audiologists regarding managing children with auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  Claire Fouché-Copley; Samantha Govender; Nasim Khan
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-06-09

Review 9.  Applicability of the P300 frequency pattern test to assess auditory processing.

Authors:  Elisângela Barros Soares Mendonça; Lilian Ferreira Muniz; Mariana de Carvalho Leal; Alcides da Silva Diniz
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.