Literature DB >> 11894126

Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grading: a pleiotropic marker of chemosensitivity in invasive ductal breast carcinomas treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Sophie Amat1, Frederique Penault-Llorca, Hervew Cure, Guillaume Le Bouedëc, Jean-Louis Achard, Isabelle Van Praagh, Viviane Feillel, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Jacques Dauplat, Philippe Chollet.   

Abstract

The Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grade, an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, was also associated with cell proliferation, a consistent indicator of response to chemotherapy. The determination of an association between SBR grade and responsiveness would be clinically useful. We explored the influence of SBR grade on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with invasive ductal breast carcinoma. The present study centered on 431 patients registered onto one of four prospective phase II trials. SBR grading was performed according to the Elston method on needle core biopsies prospectively collected prior to treatment from 290 patients and on residual tumour at surgery from 171 patients. The post-operative grades were then compared with those obtained at diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the significance of SBR grade on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Both statistical analysis revealed that SBR grade III tumours responded better to neoadjuvant treatment than SBR grade I (p<10(-6)). None of the other patient and tumour characteristics tested correlated with response. Moreover, tumour responsiveness was significantly related to changes of the SBR grade (p=7 x 10(-3)). As a conclusion, we showed that SBR grade is a strong predictive factor of response to induction chemotherapy in breast cancer, independently of the type of regimen used. The association between evolution of the histological grade following chemotherapy and response to treatment may prove valuable for clinicians as they make their decision regarding patient therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11894126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  22 in total

1.  Tumor parameters, clinical and pathological responses, medical management, and survival through time on 710 operable breast cancers.

Authors:  C Abrial; M A Mouret-Reynier; S Amat; I Sillet-Bach; P Bougnoux; R Delva; H Cure; J Dauplat; F Penault-Llorca; P Chollet
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  High-grade breast cancers include both highly sensitive and highly resistant subsets to cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tomo Osako; Rie Horii; Masaaki Matsuura; Kaoru Domoto; Yoshimi Ide; Yumi Miyagi; Shunji Takahashi; Yoshinori Ito; Takuji Iwase; Futoshi Akiyama
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent expression of platelet-derived growth factor B promotes lymphatic metastasis of hypoxic breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Luana Schito; Sergio Rey; Marco Tafani; Huafeng Zhang; Carmen Chak-Lui Wong; Andrea Russo; Matteo A Russo; Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Banu Arun; Soley Bayraktar; Diane D Liu; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Deann Atchley; Lajos Pusztai; Jennifer Keating Litton; Vicente Valero; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Constance Albarracin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  [Morphological response to therapy of breast carcinoma].

Authors:  F Länger; H-J Lück; H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 6.  Gene expression-based prognostic and predictive markers for breast cancer: a primer for practicing pathologists.

Authors:  Chungyeul Kim; Yusuke Taniyama; Soonmyung Paik
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 7.  Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Frederick Baehner; David J Dabbs; Thomas Decker; Vincenzo Eusebi; Stephen B Fox; Shu Ichihara; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Sunil R Lakhani; José Palacios; Andrea L Richardson; Stuart J Schnitt; Fernando C Schmitt; Puay-Hoon Tan; Gary M Tse; Sunil Badve; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  The association between the T309G polymorphism of the MDM2 gene and sensitivity to anticancer drug is dependent on the p53 mutational status in cellular models.

Authors:  N Faur; L Araud; A Laroche-Clary; J Kanno; J Toutain; T Yamori; J Robert; V Le Morvan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Trastuzumab, non-pegylated liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin and paclitaxel in the neoadjuvant setting of HER-2 positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Moisés Uriarte-Pinto; Ángel Escolano-Pueyo; Vicente Gimeno-Ballester; Oihana Pascual-Martínez; María Reyes Abad-Sazatornil; María José Agustín-Ferrández
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-03-07

10.  Prognostic Significance of BIRC5/Survivin in Breast Cancer: Results from Three Independent Cohorts.

Authors:  Nina Oparina; Malin C Erlandsson; Anna Fäldt Beding; Toshima Parris; Khalil Helou; Per Karlsson; Zakaria Einbeigi; Maria I Bokarewa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.