Literature DB >> 11894033

Early versus delayed carotid endarterectomy after a nondisabling ischemic stroke: a prospective randomized study.

Enzo Ballotta1, Giuseppe Da Giau, Claudio Baracchini, Elvira Abbruzzese, Marina Saladini, Giorgio Meneghetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many retrospective and a few prospective studies have analyzed the outcome of early and delayed carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after a recent minor or nondisabling stroke (ie, a minimal and stabilized focal neurologic deficit of acute onset persisting for more than 24 hours and not leading to a handicap or to a significant impairment of daily living activities), the optimal timing of surgery remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the perioperative death and stroke rates of CEA performed within 30 days (early group) or more than 30 days (delayed group) after a nondisabling ischemic stroke in patients with carotid bifurcation disease.
METHODS: During a 4-year period, of 86 patients experiencing a minor stroke, 45 were randomized to undergo early CEA and 41 to undergo delayed CEA. All patients underwent preoperative cerebral computed tomography, duplex ultrasonographic scanning and angiography of the supra-aortic trunks. All CEAs were carotid eversion endarterectomies and were performed by the same surgeon, using deep general anesthesia, with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for the selective shunting. The perioperative death and stroke rates were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: No perioperative deaths occurred in either group. No recurrent strokes occurred during the waiting period in the delayed group. The incidence of perioperative stroke was comparable in the 2 groups (1 of 45, 2% vs 1 of 41, 2%). The mean follow-up was 23 months (range, 6 to 50 months). Survival rates after 1, 2, and 3 years were similar in the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Early CEA after a nondisabling ischemic stroke can be performed safely with perioperative mortality and stroke rates comparable with those of delayed CEA. The timing of surgery does not seem to influence the benefit of the CEA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11894033     DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.119987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  6 in total

1.  RACE to protect brains.

Authors:  Thomas E Rix; Inderjit Singh; Robert Insall; Jawaharlal Senaratne
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The importance of early carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  S R Kulkarni; M S Gohel; R A Bulbulia; M R Whyman; K R Poskitt
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Early versus delayed carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Suman Annambhotla; Michael S Park; Mark L Keldahl; Mark D Morasch; Heron E Rodriguez; William H Pearce; Melina R Kibbe; Mark K Eskandari
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Restenosis after microsurgical non-patch carotid endarterectomy in 586 patients.

Authors:  Michael Reinert; Marie-Louise Mono; Dominique Kuhlen; Luigi Mariani; Alain Barth; Jürgen Beck; Robert H Andres; Jan Gralla; Rolf Wymann; Jürgen Schmidt; Christin Kauert; Gerhard Schroth; Marcel Arnold; Heinrich P Mattle; Andreas Raabe; Urs Fischer
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Safety and Efficacy of Early Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Jing Su; Guojun Wang; Han Zhao; Shizhong Zhang; Tao Liu; Xindi Su; Ning Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Immediate versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nicolle Cassola; Edina Mk da Silva; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.