Literature DB >> 11892676

Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe the weight data of pigs.

A E Huisman1, R F Veerkamp, J A M van Arendonk.   

Abstract

Various random regression models have been advocated for the fitting of covariance structures. It was suggested that a spline model would fit better to weight data than a random regression model that utilizes orthogonal polynomials. The objective of this study was to investigate which kind of random regression model fits best to weight data of pigs. Two random regression models that described weight of individual pigs, one using orthogonal polynomials, and the other using splines, were compared. A comparison with a multivariate model, Akaike's information criterion, and the Bayesian-Schwarz information criterion were used to select the best model. Genetic, permanent environmental, and total variances increased with age. Heritabilities for the multivariate model ranged from 0.14 to 0.19, and for both random regression models the heritabilities were fluctuating around 0.17. Both genetic and phenotypic correlations decreased when the interval between measurements increased. The spline model needed fewer parameters than the multivariate and polynomial models. Akaike's information criterion was least for the spline model and greatest for the multivariate model. The Bayesian-Schwarz information criterion was least for the polynomial model and greatest for the multivariate model. Residuals of all models were normally distributed. Based on these results, it is concluded that random regression models provide the best fit to pig weight data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11892676     DOI: 10.2527/2002.803575x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

Review 1.  Up hill, down dale: quantitative genetics of curvaceous traits.

Authors:  Karin Meyer; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genetic evaluation of growth of Kenya Boran cattle using random regression models.

Authors:  C B Wasike; D Indetie; W S Pitchford; J M K Ojango; A K Kahi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Estimation of genetic parameters for monthly egg production in laying hens based on random regression models.

Authors:  A Wolc; T Szwaczkowski
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Longitudinal analysis of weight showed little relationship with age at puberty in gilts.

Authors:  Garrett M See; Tasha R Gruhot; Matthew L Spangler; Ronald M Lewis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Use of random regression to estimate genetic parameters of temperament across an age continuum in a crossbred cattle population.

Authors:  Brittni P Littlejohn; David G Riley; Thomas H Welsh; Ronald D Randel; Scott T Willard; Rhonda C Vann
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Genome-wide association study on legendre random regression coefficients for the growth and feed intake trajectory on Duroc Boars.

Authors:  Jeremy T Howard; Shihui Jiao; Francesco Tiezzi; Yijian Huang; Kent A Gray; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Temporal covariance structure of multi-spectral phenotypes and their predictive ability for end-of-season traits in maize.

Authors:  Mahlet T Anche; Nicholas S Kaczmar; Nicolas Morales; James W Clohessy; Daniel C Ilut; Michael A Gore; Kelly R Robbins
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  An f2 pig resource population as a model for genetic studies of obesity and obesity-related diseases in humans: design and genetic parameters.

Authors:  Lisette J A Kogelman; Haja N Kadarmideen; Thomas Mark; Peter Karlskov-Mortensen; Camilla S Bruun; Susanna Cirera; Mette J Jacobsen; Claus B Jørgensen; Merete Fredholm
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 4.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.