BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare temperature elevations at the implant-bone interface during simulated implant surface decontamination with a CO2 and a GaAlAs laser. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stepped cylinder implants (Frialit 2) Friadent GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) with a Titanium plasma sprayed surface were inserted into bone blocks cut from pig femurs. An artificial periimplant bone defect provided access for laser irradiation in the coronal third. Both lasers were operated at 1.0-2.5 W in the cw-mode. The bone block was placed into a 37 degrees C water bath in order to simulate in vivo thermal conductivity and diffusitivity of heat. K-type thermocouples connected to a digital meter were used to register temperature changes at the periimplant bone. RESULTS: In mean, the critical threshold of 47 degrees C was exceeded after 8 seconds at a power output of 2.5 W, 13 seconds at 2.0 W, 18 seconds at 1.5 W, and 42 seconds at 1.0 W with the GaAlAs laser and 15 seconds (2.5 W), 23 seconds (2.0 W), 35 seconds (1.5 W), and 56 seconds (1.0 W) with the CO2 laser. At equal energy fluence, GaAlAs laser irradiation induced significantly higher temperature elevations than CO2 laser irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: In an energy dependent manner implant surface decontamination with both laser types must be limited in time to allow the implant and bone to cool down. Clinical guidelines are presented to avoid tissue damage. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare temperature elevations at the implant-bone interface during simulated implant surface decontamination with a CO2 and a GaAlAs laser. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stepped cylinder implants (Frialit 2) Friadent GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) with a Titanium plasma sprayed surface were inserted into bone blocks cut from pig femurs. An artificial periimplant bone defect provided access for laser irradiation in the coronal third. Both lasers were operated at 1.0-2.5 W in the cw-mode. The bone block was placed into a 37 degrees C water bath in order to simulate in vivo thermal conductivity and diffusitivity of heat. K-type thermocouples connected to a digital meter were used to register temperature changes at the periimplant bone. RESULTS: In mean, the critical threshold of 47 degrees C was exceeded after 8 seconds at a power output of 2.5 W, 13 seconds at 2.0 W, 18 seconds at 1.5 W, and 42 seconds at 1.0 W with the GaAlAs laser and 15 seconds (2.5 W), 23 seconds (2.0 W), 35 seconds (1.5 W), and 56 seconds (1.0 W) with the CO2 laser. At equal energy fluence, GaAlAs laser irradiation induced significantly higher temperature elevations than CO2 laser irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: In an energy dependent manner implant surface decontamination with both laser types must be limited in time to allow the implant and bone to cool down. Clinical guidelines are presented to avoid tissue damage. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Frank Schwarz; Daniel Rothamel; Monika Herten; Katrin Bieling; Werner Scherbaum; Jürgen Becker Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2004-07-08 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Frank Schwarz; Anton Sculean; Georg Romanos; Monika Herten; Nadine Horn; Werner Scherbaum; Jürgen Becker Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2005-04-20 Impact factor: 3.573